Jump to content

Graham Platner, Democrat Candidate & Rising Star

Maximum Overkill
 Share

Recommended Posts

Meglamaniac FF Geek

Meglamaniac

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Caine Mutiny said:

Yeah we know. What you want is to force an election between Platner and Collins. You’ve posted as much. You have no credibility. You support a political party that attempted to steal the 2020 election and is trying to steal this one. The good news is you have no say in the matter, and the better news is that you’re going to be stunned just how many Republicans and independents in Maine end up voting for the Democrat no matter who it is. 

They stilin our elections!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

But there is no voter fraud, derp derp derp

  • Like 1
  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

OldMaid
OldMaid

There is no twisting.  Donald Trump is a convicted felon and adjudicated sexual abuser, he talks about grabbing women by p, he's all over the Epstein files, he tried to steal an election.  You can't c

Hardcore troubadour
Hardcore troubadour

Democrats think everyone is a Nazi except for the guy with the Nazi tattoo. 

Herbivore
Herbivore

you guys are trying real hard for the Nazi label to stick. I would not have suspected that the tattoo was nazi related. I reject the idea that it is widely known to be. Is there anything else there? C

jerryskids FF Geek

jerryskids

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Ok great he’s a socialist. He can run as a Socialist with one of the Socialist parties that are on a myriad of ballots or he can be an Independent & plaster “Socialist” on his campaign.

Well I already agreed with you on 10/7/23, and I agree with you here. Apologies for not carefully editing my posts.

Thanks, I appreciate it.  I'm sensitive to it because the Leftist MSM does it all the time.  You often see comments/headlines like "Republicans Jump On [insert bad thing a Dem did]".  The issue is phrased to focus on the jumping vs. the bad thing. :cheers:

  • Thanks 1
jerryskids FF Geek

jerryskids

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

He's not a Socialist - he's a Communist.  That's what ALL of these "Socialists" are - Communists in hiding.  Once they get enough power the masks will come off, but make no mistake - these people are Communists.

And I don't need to remind anyone of what that looks like. We have over 100 years of history of how that works out - it's never good.  Communism makes Fascism look like Choir Rehearsal.

Eh, I don't think Platner is pseud enough to be a Communist.  He's a useful idiot that the Party needs on their path to control.  But in the end, like Boxer the horse in Animal Farm, the pigs will sell him to the glue factory when he wears out his usefulness.

EternalShinyAndChrome FF Geek

EternalShinyAndChrome

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Eh, I don't think Platner is pseud enough to be a Communist.  He's a useful idiot that the Party needs on their path to control.  But in the end, like Boxer the horse in Animal Farm, the pigs will sell him to the glue factory when he wears out his usefulness.

Oh, 100%, but those are called "Useful Communists".  Useful until their masters get what they want and then, well, to the glue factory.  Communist jistory is replete with this tactic.

SaintsInDome2006 FF Geek

SaintsInDome2006

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

Yup

 

I still think this is funny, but c’mon MAGAs actually paying their President for knockoff phones with his name slapped on it is way funnier. Corrupt as all hell but funnier.

Strike FF Geek

Strike

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Caine Mutiny said:

Yeah we know. What you want is to force an election between Platner and Collins. You’ve posted as much. You have no credibility. You support a political party that attempted to steal the 2020 election and is trying to steal this one. The good news is you have no say in the matter, and the better news is that you’re going to be stunned just how many Republicans and independents in Maine end up voting for the Democrat no matter who it is. 

Quit speaking for me.  Your lack of reading comprehension skills make it impossible for you to do that.  In order to understand intelligent posts you have to have a reasonable level of intelligence, which you don't.  And you ignored the point that the Dems have no rules for this situation.  If they do, post a link.  Bet you don't because you're just making sh*t up again.

Caine Mutiny FF Geek

Caine Mutiny

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Strike said:

Quit speaking for me.  Your lack of reading comprehension skills make it impossible for you to do that.  In order to understand intelligent posts you have to have a reasonable level of intelligence, which you don't.  And you ignored the point that the Dems have no rules for this situation.  If they do, post a link.  Bet you don't because you're just making sh*t up again.

Lol. You just look worse and worse here. 
 

Here are the rules for replacing Platner: the ones you claim don’t exist: 

https://www.mainepublic.org/politics/2026-07-10/the-latest-on-how-maine-democrats-will-nominate-graham-platners-replacement

Strike FF Geek

Strike

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

Lol. You just look worse and worse here. 
 

Here are the rules for replacing Platner: the ones you claim don’t exist: 

https://www.mainepublic.org/politics/2026-07-10/the-latest-on-how-maine-democrats-will-nominate-graham-platners-replacement

This is what I responded to:

Quote

The Democratjc Party has established rules. Their delegates are going to vote on a candidate. It will not be Janet Mills because she doesn’t want it. 

A NORMAL person would read that as the Democratic party has HAD rules for this situation in place since before Platner dropped out so anyone complaining about it should have been on notice of what would happen if he did.  It sounds like you're suggesting that because they CREATED rules AFTER he dropped out, that that is "established rules."  No buddy.  It's exactly because they created the rules AFTER the sh*t hit the fan that they're disenfranchising EVERYONE who voted in the primary for Platner.  Everything you've posted about rules is from AFTER the sh*t hit the fan with Platner.  As I noted above, it appears to this observer that they want to Kamala the candidate but make it LOOK (d)ifferent.  

And this is why you shouldn't speak for me.  Your lack of intelligence just makes it impossible. 

Caine Mutiny FF Geek

Caine Mutiny

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Strike said:

This is what I responded to:

A NORMAL person would read that as the Democratic party has HAD rules for this situation in place since before Platner dropped out so anyone complaining about it should have been on notice of what would happen if he did.  It sounds like you're suggesting that because the CREATED rules AFTER he dropped out, that that is "established rules."  No buddy.  They're disenfranchising EVERYONE who voted in the primary.  Everything you've posted about rules is from AFTER the sh*t hit the fan with Platner.  As I noted above, it appears to this observer that they want to Kamala the candidate but make it LOOK (d)ifferent.  

And this is why you shouldn't speak for me.  Your lack of intelligence just makes it impossible. 

Trust me I don’t want to speak for you because you are a moron. And you’re moving the goalpost. You just wrote “the Dems have no rules for this situation”. That was wrong. You were simply ignorant- again. The rest of what you wrote is irrelevant garbage. 

seafoam1 FF Geek

seafoam1

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

Trust me I don’t want to speak for you because you are a moron. And you’re moving the goalpost. You just wrote “the Dems have no rules for this situation”. That was wrong. You were simply ignorant- again. The rest of what you wrote is irrelevant garbage. 

Two morons arguing with each other is awesome entertainment...:banana:

squistion FF Geek

squistion

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

Trust me I don’t want to speak for you because you are a moron. And you’re moving the goalpost. You just wrote “the Dems have no rules for this situation”. That was wrong. You were simply ignorant- again. The rest of what you wrote is irrelevant garbage. 

How could they not have rules? They would have to have some mechanism in place to replace the nominee by a certain date, for whatever reason. The idea that they came up the rules on the fly is ludicruous.

seafoam1 FF Geek

seafoam1

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, squistion said:

How could they not have rules? They would have to have some mechanism in place to replace the nominee by a certain date, for whatever reason. The idea that they came up the rules on the fly is ludicruous.

:doh: jeez....

TimHauck FF Geek

TimHauck

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Caine Mutiny said:

I don’t share your pessimism. Or, actually I am an even bigger pessimist than you. 
 

See I think that we are only beginning to see the pain from Trump’s disastrous decision to bomb Iran. I believe we will see that pain increase by November and then I don’t think any of this stuff is going to matter. It’s going to be toss the (R) bums out. 
 

of course I hope I’m wrong about the pain part 

I have no clue what will happen nationally, but I do think a lot of people in Maine (including independents) liked Platner, and that he was going to win barring serious allegations like just came out.  Some of MAGA seem to think those independents will now vote R because “the D’s support rape” or some nonsense…I think a lot of them just won’t vote.

seafoam1 FF Geek

seafoam1

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

I have no clue what will happen nationally, but I do think a lot of people in Maine (including independents) liked Platner, and that he was going to win barring serious allegations like just came out.  Some of MAGA seem to think those independents will now vote R because “the D’s support rape” or some nonsense…I think a lot of them just won’t vote.

Who will the liberal voters of Maine vote in now in his place? 

And what are the dates of the new election for them? 

TimHauck FF Geek

TimHauck

Posted
Posted
On 7/10/2026 at 3:39 PM, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

What's your point? That it was a conspiracy to expose his Nazi tattoo?  You really think it's a tattoo that makes him a Nazi?  :lol:

 

On 7/10/2026 at 3:44 PM, TimHauck said:

That’s what MAGA thinks, because the tattoo is literally the only piece of evidence to suggest he’s a Nazi.  Everything he’s said, including in his Reddit post, shows that he is explicitly ANTI-Nazi.

 

On 7/10/2026 at 3:51 PM, SaintsInDome2006 said:

TimH, I don’t think MAGAs believe it themselves. 

I got like 3 laughing emojis on a post where I said he wasn’t a Nazi.  MAGA definitely thinks he’s actually a Nazi. Lol

League Champion FF Geek

League Champion

Posted
Posted

Mamdani breaks silence on 'perverted' ally who helped sell Platner before scandal-plagued collapse

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani announced that he will continue to work with Morris Katz, one of the leading political consultants behind Graham Platner’s doomed bid for Senate.

"I will continue to work with Morris Katz, he remains a top advisor of mine," Mamdani said at a news conference on Monday.

Many of Katz’s fellow Democrats lambasted him after Platner withdrew from the race following a rape accusation – which Platner denied – from an ex-girlfriend, arguing that Katz failed to do his due diligence before promoting Platner to party leaders. Some in the party are now calling for him to be blacklisted from future political operations.

In addition to a rape accusation, Platner also attracted scrutiny over a trove of controversial deleted Reddit posts, a Nazi-linked tattoo he acquired while serving in the military and his alleged mistreatment of women.

New York City Mayor Mamdani keeps Platner consultant amid rape allegations | Fox News https://share.google/jQQOrv9utAGp64utu

Hardcore troubadour FF Geek

Hardcore troubadour

Posted
Posted
On 7/6/2026 at 6:17 PM, squistion said:

From NYT:

Senator Ruben Gallego, Democrat of Arizona, said in a social media post that he was rescinding his endorsement of Platner, calling the allegations against him “troubling and deeply serious.” Gallego has faced a firestorm of criticism for his endorsement of former Representative Eric Swalwell, the California Democrat who resigned from Congress and ended his campaign for governor in the face of multiple allegations of sexual assault.

Be getting rid of Ruben next. Chance to pick up another seat. Don’t Fock the help 

TimHauck FF Geek

TimHauck

Posted
Posted
On 7/19/2026 at 1:57 PM, HellToupee said:

Why on earth would you have a favorite in Maine??

 

On 6/22/2026 at 9:43 AM, Strike said:

That's what we like to call a NATIONAL race.  If he wins, the things he votes for may affect me. 

@Strike : That's what we like to call a NATIONAL race.  If he wins, the things he votes for may affect me.  

Voltaire FF Geek

Voltaire

Posted
Posted
On 7/11/2026 at 1:31 PM, jerryskids said:

Thanks, I appreciate it.  I'm sensitive to it because the Leftist MSM does it all the time.  You often see comments/headlines like "Republicans Jump On [insert bad thing a Dem did]".  The issue is phrased to focus on the jumping vs. the bad thing. :cheers:

They like "pounce" too.

"Republicans pounce on ______________ . "

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...