Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said:

LOL

An opinion piece from May, yea I'll take the actual numbers being reported that say it's likely to be the most heavily attended World Cup in history over a article written by Michael Hiltzik in the LA Times.

 

These are the reasons you look so stupid so often

Megla, get with the program.  Visitors to LA are down not because it is a festering puss of a city, it's because Trump!

Also, it probably doesn't help LA that Iran is in Group G.  Heck, the team can't even stay in the US except on game days (not sure if that is a US or Iranian rule).  If one of the teams is from an Islamic terrorist state with whom we are in a conflict, that probably limits immigration numbers. 

  • Sad 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Megla, get with the program.  Visitors to LA are down not because it is a festering puss of a city, it's because Trump!

Also, it probably doesn't help LA that Iran is in Group G.  Heck, the team can't even stay in the US except on game days (not sure if that is a US or Iranian rule).  If one of the teams is from an Islamic terrorist state with whom we are in a conflict, that probably limits immigration numbers. 

 I haven't noticed any world cup folks in LA.  I typically stick to the beach cities (redondo, Manhattan, hermosa, el segundo, Palos verdes)

Then I looked at the teams in the LA games... Paraguay, Iran, bosnia, turkey, switzerland, and New Zealand. 

I guess they couldn't have thrown LA a couple countries with some fine chicks like brazil or netherlands.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

Hotels are booked months in advance. 
 

Let’s see how this all shapes out when it’s done. I hope you’re right. There is no argument that the World Cup has been great for tourism. California alone is projected to make 1.2. billion in revenue.  But it could have been a lot more. Some folks are staying home. And yes Trump is largely to blame. 

Some are some aren't, like I said, show me the current numbers, you know the one's showing this as one of the most attended World Cups in history

Posted
10 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

Hotels are booked months in advance. 
 

Let’s see how this all shapes out when it’s done. I hope you’re right. There is no argument that the World Cup has been great for tourism. California alone is projected to make 1.2. billion in revenue.  But it could have been a lot more. Some folks are staying home. And yes Trump is largely to blame. 

Don't back track now, SHOW ME THE MONEY, or just keep playing the blame Trump game

So sad

Posted
28 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said:

How about

 

he current 2026 FIFA World Cup is averaging 64,276 spectators per match across North America, tracking to become the highest-attended tournament in history. Historic tournament averages range from 42,000 to 68,000,

Uh, 64,276 is less than 68,000.

@Meglamaniac wrong again.

  • 1994 FIFA World Cup (United States)
    • Total attendance: 3,587,538
    • Matches: 52
    • Average attendance: 68,991 spectators per match (often rounded to about 69,000)
Posted
38 minutes ago, nobody said:

I like how the world cup is a complete free roll for the US.  When we lose, it's like "meh.  good try" if we somehow show well, everyone is like "fock yeah!"

You are clearly not a Minnesota sports fan; the above is practically our mantra.

Endless disappointment will do that.

Posted
30 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

That Mbappe guy is pretty good.

 

Posted
7 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Uh, 64,276 is less than 68,000.

@Meglamaniac wrong again.

  • 1994 FIFA World Cup (United States)
    • Total attendance: 3,587,538
    • Matches: 52
    • Average attendance: 68,991 spectators per match (often rounded to about 69,000)

Your desperation is showing. Megla clearly stated averages ranging up to 68,000 (oh boy he didn’t round to 69,000) and that this current was TRACKING to top that average.

you know there has only been 5-6 days of matches so far, right?

Posted
7 minutes ago, WhiteWonder said:

Your desperation is showing. Megla clearly stated averages ranging up to 68,000 (oh boy he didn’t round to 69,000) and that this current was TRACKING to top that average. 

How is 64,276 tracking to beat 69,000?

Posted
4 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

These vids of the Scots (my people!) invading Boston are fantastic 

 

I am a Scott. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

How is 64,276 tracking to beat 69,000?

You don’t think the games after the group stages draw even larger? Or that every USMNT game as they continue to play well would draw more?

Posted
14 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

How is 64,276 tracking to beat 69,000?

The game I went to drew 68,200 for a round 1 game. Fans of teams like Ecuador show out. When lesser teams are bounced and we get to elimination rounds, I’m fairly certain those numbers will go up and bring the averages with them. May even happen as we see more anticipated group play matchups and pivotal 3rd games 

Posted
7 minutes ago, WhiteWonder said:

You don’t think the games after the group stages draw even larger? Or that every USMNT game as they continue to play well would draw more?

Sure, but almost 70% of the total games are in the group stage.  It’s possible it tops it, but that doesn’t seem like “tracking” to me

Posted
2 minutes ago, easilyscan said:

Watched most of Norway vs Iraq

Not a big soccer fan, but I have to admit it was entertaining.

Very impressed by the lack of time outs/commercials.

Nice and that one didn’t even have any of the late game sweat that you get in a tied or 1 goal game.

Agreed the running clock is very nice.

Posted
9 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Nice and that one didn’t even have any of the late game sweat that you get in a tied or 1 goal game.

Agreed the running clock is very nice.

Are either one of the teams I saw expected to be a serious contender to win it ?

I'm shopping for a Norway jersey right now. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, easilyscan said:

Are either one of the teams I saw expected to be a serious contender to win it ?

I'm shopping for a Norway jersey right now. 

Iraq no way.

But Norway is one of those dark horse squads I believe outside the main favorites. They have that crazy looking blonde dude who I always see listed as one of the best players in the WC so that’s always nice.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, easilyscan said:

Are either one of the teams I saw expected to be a serious contender to win it ?

I'm shopping for a Norway jersey right now. 

I haven’t followed rankings this year, but they have an elite player on their squad

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Iraq no way.

But Norway is one of those dark horse squads I believe outside the main favorites. They have that crazy looking blonde dude who I always see listed as one of the best players in the WC so that’s always nice.

I noticed him right away. He's relentless!

Posted
4 hours ago, easilyscan said:

I noticed him right away. He's relentless!

Total unit. Also looks like he’s coked up out of his mind but that’s just the generations of Viking rage coursing through him.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, thegeneral said:

These vids of the Scots (my people!) invading Boston are fantastic

Claiming scots are his people not americans. 

Posted

This has been fantastic for the people of Scotland and other countries to be here and enjoy what we take for granted way too often.  Love watching these fans enjoying the USA.

Posted
23 minutes ago, Mike Hunt said:

This has been fantastic for the people of Scotland and other countries to be here and enjoy what we take for granted way too often.  Love watching these fans enjoying the USA.

Don’t tell them that the liberals have ruined all these cities they are partying up in 😜

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Sure, but almost 70% of the total games are in the group stage.  It’s possible it tops it, but that doesn’t seem like “tracking” to me

I'm not making any claims that it will set a record, but you telling Megla that he is "wrong again" is just silly and shows your personal grudge with him, telling him he is wrong again based on the averages less than 6 full days into the world cup :lol:

Here is something else to consider. In 1994, venues like Toronto, Vancouver, Guadalajara and Monterrey were not hosting games. These venues are the lowest capacity venues in this years event, all under 53,000. Guadalajara does not host in the knockout rounds and by the round of 16, Toronto and Monterrey are gone (thats the 3 lowest capacity venues). The final 8 games of the tournament all take place in larger US stadiums and only miss out on the largest (Mexico City). 

Posted
2 hours ago, thegeneral said:

What up brother!

sadly not Adam

Posted
4 hours ago, thegeneral said:

Total unit. Also looks like he’s coked up out of his mind but that’s just the generations Viking rage coursing through him.

That's why they're my 2nd team behind the US. God knows my Vikings are never going to win a Super Bowl !!

Posted
9 hours ago, WhiteWonder said:

I'm not making any claims that it will set a record, but you telling Megla that he is "wrong again" is just silly and shows your personal grudge with him, telling him he is wrong again based on the averages less than 6 full days into the world cup :lol:

Here is something else to consider. In 1994, venues like Toronto, Vancouver, Guadalajara and Monterrey were not hosting games. These venues are the lowest capacity venues in this years event, all under 53,000. Guadalajara does not host in the knockout rounds and by the round of 16, Toronto and Monterrey are gone (thats the 3 lowest capacity venues). The final 8 games of the tournament all take place in larger US stadiums and only miss out on the largest (Mexico City). 

Tell Moderate Tim to learn to read and STFU

 

The U.S. tournament is on track to be the most heavily attended in World Cup history,

 

current 2026 FIFA World Cup is averaging 64,276 spectators per match across North America, tracking to become the highest-attended tournament in history. Historic tournament averages range from 42,000 to 68,000,

 

show me the current numbers, you know the one's showing this as one of the most attended World Cups in history

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...