Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 6/23/2026 at 8:51 AM, Strike said:

So apparently Fauci had voluntarily agreed to appear in front of Congress but after Tulsi dropped these documents he has backed out and forced them to subpoena him to testify.  Nothing to see here, right?

 

On 6/23/2026 at 9:33 AM, Strike said:

Everything you posted might be valid if he hadn't already agreed to testify.  Backing out after a document dump should make you wonder whether he's worried about things in that document dump being brought up if he testifies, BECAUSE he no longer has 5th amendment protections.

 

On 6/23/2026 at 9:20 AM, TimHauck said:

Link to Fauci only saying he wouldn’t testify after Tulsi released these documents? I know you got this from redstate.com by the way and it’s not in there.

Bump.  Strike can’t admit he was making unsubstantiated allegations.  Sad.

Posted
On 7/3/2026 at 8:00 AM, League Champion said:

Liberals think Men are Women, SCIENCE! 

<<<As the principal at The Kleio Group, Emily works with high profile companies, celebrities, entrepreneurs, politicians and scientists who face strategic communication challenges or find themselves in a crisis. Emily’s work as a business leader includes time spent working with large Arab conglomerates in the GCC region of the Middle East looking to partner with American interests. Emily acquired Prep Cosmetics, expanded it to become a national chain and revolutionized the way women bought beauty products by offering novel online shopping experiences, which are now the industry standard. She was a partner in a dating app that used the new technology of geolocation to help interested parties meet up in real life.

—- I like to be open minded so I thought I’d look up Emily Kaplan & her group. She’s not a physician or researcher, she just sells stuff. 

This also has nothing to with Covid or Gabbard.
 

Posted
On 6/23/2026 at 8:51 AM, Strike said:

So apparently Fauci had voluntarily agreed to appear in front of Congress but after Tulsi dropped these documents he has backed out and forced them to subpoena him to testify.  Nothing to see here, right?

 

On 6/23/2026 at 9:33 AM, Strike said:

Everything you posted might be valid if he hadn't already agreed to testify.  Backing out after a document dump should make you wonder whether he's worried about things in that document dump being brought up if he testifies, BECAUSE he no longer has 5th amendment protections.

 

On 6/23/2026 at 9:20 AM, TimHauck said:

Link to Fauci only saying he wouldn’t testify after Tulsi released these documents? I know you got this from redstate.com by the way and it’s not in there.

Strike can’t admit he was making unsubstantiated allegations.  Sad.

Posted
On 6/23/2026 at 8:51 AM, Strike said:

So apparently Fauci had voluntarily agreed to appear in front of Congress but after Tulsi dropped these documents he has backed out and forced them to subpoena him to testify.  Nothing to see here, right?

 

On 6/23/2026 at 9:33 AM, Strike said:

Everything you posted might be valid if he hadn't already agreed to testify.  Backing out after a document dump should make you wonder whether he's worried about things in that document dump being brought up if he testifies, BECAUSE he no longer has 5th amendment protections.

 

On 6/23/2026 at 9:20 AM, TimHauck said:

Link to Fauci only saying he wouldn’t testify after Tulsi released these documents? I know you got this from redstate.com by the way and it’s not in there.

Strike can’t admit he was making unsubstantiated allegations.  Sad

Posted
1 minute ago, Strike said:
You've chosen to ignore content by TimHauck. Options

You've chosen to ignore content by TimHauck. Options

You've chosen to ignore content by TimHauck. Options
 
 
:dunno:

I don't ignore anyone here, I just choose not to respond to some.  (mostly)

Posted
1 hour ago, Strike said:
You've chosen to ignore content by TimHauck. Options
You've chosen to ignore content by TimHauck. Options
You've chosen to ignore content by TimHauck. Options
 
 
:dunno:

 

1 hour ago, SUXBNME said:

I don't ignore anyone here, I just choose not to respond to some.  (mostly)

Yeah other than peefoam (and even he’s fun to reply to sometimes), there’s really no need to put anyone on ignore.

And lol at Strike pretending he doesn’t know what I wrote, the conversation where he’s refusing to admit he was making unsubstantiated allegations started before he put me on ignore.  And he’s now joined the club of folks who put me on ignore purely because they don’t like me proving them wrong.

He also specifically called me out for referring to conversations not relevant to the particular thread.  I only do that because he conveniently ignores when he’s wrong in the threads here he’s wrong (which happens a lot), and he’s just showing that to be true yet again here.

Posted

It's fun to know that Tulsi dropped the goods on Fauci.  We all knew he was nefarious and a liar.  He makes Hitler and Stalin look like amateurs.  Those of you who followed along with his nonsense are unforgivable.  And we won't, nor shouldn't, forgive you or forget.  

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, BudBro said:

It's fun to know that Tulsi dropped the goods on Fauci.  We all knew he was nefarious and a liar.  He makes Hitler and Stalin look like amateurs.  Those of you who followed along with his nonsense are unforgivable.  And we won't, nor shouldn't, forgive you or forget.  

Was there anything we didn’t already have in the documents from Tulsi? 

Posted
1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Was there anything we didn’t already have in the documents from Tulsi? 

No.  All was there.  Yet, you continue to cheer for the wrong person in the scenario.  Wise up.

Posted
Just now, BudBro said:

No.  All was there.  Yet, you continue to cheer for the wrong person in the scenario.  Wise up.

So how could Gabbard be considered to have “dropped the goods” if she didn’t give us anything new?

Posted
5 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

So how could Gabbard be considered to have “dropped the goods” if she didn’t give us anything new?

If you didn't read the release (which we all know you wouldn't), it isn't my place to help you.  The great news is that you were wrong, as we all knew.  You're the problem with this country.  If you'd rather not be here, I can help you leave and would be glad to watch.

Posted
7 minutes ago, BudBro said:

No.  All was there.  Yet, you continue to cheer for the wrong person in the scenario.  Wise up.

Put him on ignore or don't respond like most of us are starting to do. 
Not Geek Club material

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, SUXBNME said:

Put him on ignore or don't respond like most of us are starting to do. 
Not Geek Club material

;-).  I would, but these covid jab f&*ks need driven from this planet.  

Posted
7 minutes ago, BudBro said:

If you didn't read the release (which we all know you wouldn't), it isn't my place to help you. 

You already admitted there wasn’t anything new in there.

Posted
38 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Strike can’t admit he was making unsubstantiated allegations.  Sad

Ok man, just stop. We all know Strike is an arrogant dink that can't admit being wrong. Which means he fits right in with most posters here. You and your crusade to get him to do something he never will is far more annoying than his behavior.

Let. It. Go.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Ok man, just stop. We all know Strike is an arrogant dink that can't admit being wrong. Which means he fits right in with me.

😆

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...