Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Great point.

It seems that once again our Lefties (and Moderate Tim, a centrist) are confusing evidence and proof.

There may not be incontrovertible proof that Fauci funded GOF research, but there is a lot of evidence.  Heck, Moderate Tim spelled it out nicely.

There may not be incontrovertible evidence that someone else used the autopen, but there is plenty of evidence.

It's hilarious that Moderate Tim of all people is lecturing me on nuance.  Utterly ridiculous!  :lol: 

Wait, you think my comments about the WIV are evidence Fauci funded GOF research?  lol.

Posted
7 hours ago, jerryskids said:

Great point.

It seems that once again our Lefties (and Moderate Tim, a centrist) are confusing evidence and proof.

There may not be incontrovertible proof that Fauci funded GOF research, but there is a lot of evidence.  Heck, Moderate Tim spelled it out nicely.

There may not be incontrovertible evidence that someone else used the autopen, but there is plenty of evidence.

It's hilarious that Moderate Tim of all people is lecturing me on nuance.  Utterly ridiculous!  :lol: 

Here’s how you know you are wrong in this. The Mueller investigation generated scores of charges & several convictions. The Jan6 report generated hundreds of convictions & indictments for insurrection, incitement, including the former President. 

The Trump DOJ - which - by their own proud admission - has been indicting Trump enemies for the most insignificant claims & far outside the hundred year old department guidelines on proof including the sort of things you mention - won’t indict anyone from all this. And we’re talking about claims of the highest order like treason, mass murder, spying, and the like.

  • Haha 2
Posted
33 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Huh?  I didn’t say cure, I said effective.  And Weinstein even touted a study he claimed showed it was “100% effective,” but later admitted he was wrong to do that.

ok if you didnt say cure (although I bet somewhere you did) effective is relative

cough syrup did nothing but sure was affective for me

Ivermectin is 100% affective but what is it affective against, supporting your immune system, guess what it fights parasites, that require your body to fight, so it assists in that and allows your body to focus on other things

 

Posted
4 hours ago, nobody said:

And exactly 0 consequences will ever come.

Because there’s nothing to bring consequences on. The Trump administration hated Gabbard so much they locked her out of intelligence briefings & war discussions. They don’t believe her or any of this crap.

Posted
30 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Here’s how you know you are wrong in this. The Mueller investigation generated scores of charges & several convictions. The Jan6 report generated hundreds of convictions & indictments for insurrection, incitement, including the former President. 

The Trump DOJ - which - by their own proud admission - has been been indicting Trump enemies for the most insignificant claims & far outside the hundred year old department guidelines on proof including the sort of things you mention - won’t indict anyone from all this. And we’re talking about claims of the highest order like treason, mass murder, spying, and the like.

no it didnt, not a single person was charged nor convicted for insurrection

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Because there’s nothing to bring consequences on. The Trump administration hated Gabbard so much they locked her out of intelligence briefings & war discussions. They don’t believe her or any of this crap.

oh they did?  according to your source (the homeless bum) that is close to white house

Posted
10 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

oh they did?  according to your source (the homeless bum) that is close to white house

I completely forgot. Journalism doesn’t exist, it’s a pack of liars writing lies about things that never happened. I am so sorry I raised news reports. You know what, expect charges on what must be a score of criminals & a hundred charges on Americans & Chinese based on this report due to the weight of Gabbard’s claims. She’s highly respected inside the Trump DOJ, expect action on things like treason, mass murder, sedition, & corruption soon.

Posted
9 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

no it didnt, not a single person was charged nor convicted for insurrection

lol, same guy conflating calling effective vs cure is whining about the semantics of the specific charges for Jan 6ers

Posted
3 minutes ago, CaptainObvious1 said:

It's all crap because a full blown TDS assclown at FFToday claims it is?  There's lot of smoke that would indicate she is right.

Ha, no of course not. It’s crap because Todd Blanche has already thrown it in his desk trashcan.

Posted
1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

My evidence is that the policies of his presidency were much more progressive than the previous 50-ish years of his political life.  

Which one? Please be specific here. 

Posted
26 minutes ago, CaptainObvious1 said:

TDS

Let’s say I have a psychological syndrome where I am so deranged (disconnected from reality) about anything Trump touches or looks at. Fine. Even ***I believe & have full faith & belief in my President & his administration that if he and they really truly believed these claims about treason, bioweapons, criminal conspiracy, and coordination with enemies that have thousands of nuclear weapons pointed at us, resulting in a million American deaths, that he would follow this path to the end of the Earth to punish these traitors.

Let’s watch shall we, as federal agents swarm across the country to seize the guilty. 

Posted
Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Let’s say I have a psychological syndrome where I am so deranged (disconnected from reality) about anything Trump touches or looks at. Fine. Even ***I believe & have full faith & belief in my President & his administration that if he and they really truly believed these claims about treason, bioweapons, criminal conspiracy, and coordination with enemies that have thousands of nuclear weapons pointed at us, resulting in a million American deaths, that he would follow this path to the end of the Earth to punish these traitors.

Let’s watch shall we, as federal agents swarm across the country to seize the guilty. 

This response is way too long for @CaptainObvious1/Brahma Bulls. In the future please confine yourself to words of two syllables at most and no more than two sentences per post. Out of consideration, TIA

  • Like 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, CaptainObvious1 said:

TDS

We’re still doing this? Isn’t this almost saying “groovy” while wearing bellbottoms by now? Get new material. 
 

“I saw a man named Barry look me in the eyes and tell me he wouldn’t bang my wife while he was literally banging her! I’m upset. I guess I have Barry Derangement Syndrome!”

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, The Liberal Media said:

We’re still doing this? Isn’t this almost saying “groovy” while wearing bellbottoms by now? Get new material. 
 

“I saw a man named Barry look me in the eyes and tell me he wouldn’t bang my wife while he was literally banging her! I’m upset. I guess I have Barry Derangement Syndrome!”

You held an alias for 21 years before using it?  Go touch some grass my man.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

Transgender children, and LGBTQ+ in general, through the Executive Order 14075—Advancing Equality for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Intersex Individuals

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-14075-advancing-equality-for-lesbian-gay-bisexual-transgender-queer-and

I accept your L.

You don’t get it. It’s a terrible example because Biden changed with the times, not as a result of dementia. He made speeches on this issue. It was done with his consent not without his knowledge. 
Biden, like many centrist Democrats, moved left on social issues over a long period of time. So did Obama, so did Hillary. To attempt to use this as evidence of him not being in control is an extremely poor argument.

Sorry Jerry the W is mine. 

  • Like 2
  • Mike FF Today changed the title to Gabbard Drops Fauci COVID-19 Receipts On Last Day
Posted
3 hours ago, TimHauck said:

lol, same guy conflating calling effective vs cure is whining about the semantics of the specific charges for Jan 6ers

a charge is a criminal activity, efficacy rates are variable

but yah its the same

might as well just say murder, since we should charge Fauci with the same

 

Posted
3 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

I completely forgot. Journalism doesn’t exist, it’s a pack of liars writing lies about things that never happened. I am so sorry I raised news reports. You know what, expect charges on what must be a score of criminals & a hundred charges on Americans & Chinese based on this report due to the weight of Gabbard’s claims. She’s highly respected inside the Trump DOJ, expect action on things like treason, mass murder, sedition, & corruption soon.

I dont expect crap, the trump admin is full of sh1t puss1es

Posted
1 hour ago, Caine Mutiny said:

You don’t get it. It’s a terrible example because Biden changed with the times, not as a result of dementia. He made speeches on this issue. It was done with his consent not without his knowledge. 
Biden, like many centrist Democrats, moved left on social issues over a long period of time. So did Obama, so did Hillary. To attempt to use this as evidence of him not being in control is an extremely poor argument.

Sorry Jerry the W is mine. 

Jerry:  Biden suddenly became progressive.

Caine:  Prove it!  Be specific!

Jerry:  Proves it.

Caine:  Not fair!  He made speeches, he changed, he loved transing the kids like many centrist Democrats!

 

Since I gave you the courtesy of specifics including a link, perhaps you'll give me the courtesy of a link to video of him on these speeches?  I'm not really doubting he was told to go up and read the words, but I'd like to see what he looks like advocating for hormone blockers for children.  :thumbsup: 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Jerry:  Biden suddenly became progressive.

Caine:  Prove it!  Be specific!

Jerry:  Proves it.

But you started out your theory by saying he “wasn’t running things by the end of his term.”  Your evidence of this is something that happened in 2022?

Posted
1 hour ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Your boy Biden pardoned him for mass murder.  

Have you read the report in the original post? It involves dozens & scores of people. Because he’s been pardoned Fauci can now be compelled to testify, because he can’t be prosecuted he can’t plead the 5th. Trump was there, he appointed Fauci, put him up front on the podium every single day, so Trump would be a witness. Redfern oversaw everything, call him. Pompeo’s State Department did an inspection before the pandemic, call him. We’ve never seen the inspection report, let’s see that.

They can especially indict the Chinese agents at the Wuhan lab, the people at HHS who did the contracts & cover-up.

And Xi is at the top of it all. But in case you haven’t noticed Trump absolutely loves Xi, adores him, thinks they’re real Bros.

Maga says they believe this stuff. Well if that’s the case you’re not remotely pissed off enough.

Posted
12 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Have you read the report in the original post? It involves dozens & scores of people. Because he’s been pardoned Fauci can now be compelled to testify, because he can’t be prosecuted he can’t plead the 5th. Trump was there, he appointed Fauci, put him up front on the podium every single day, so Trump would be a witness. Redfern oversaw everything, call him. Pompeo’s State Department did an inspection before the pandemic, call him. We’ve never seen the inspection report, let’s see that.

They can especially indict the Chinese agents at the Wuhan lab, the people at HHS who did the contracts & cover-up.

And Xi is at the top of it all. But in case you haven’t noticed Trump absolutely loves Xi, adores him, thinks they’re real Bros.

Maga says they believe this stuff. Well if that’s the case you’re not remotely pissed off enough.

Has there been any “smoking gun” shared from the emails?  Seems weird that Tulsi released 400 pages of documents but didn’t point to any specific ones as particularly damaging, just some vague accusations.

Posted
1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Has there been any “smoking gun” shared from the emails?  Seems weird that Tulsi released 400 pages of documents but didn’t point to any specific ones as particularly damaging, just some vague accusations.

No. I was just looking at the releases. The redactions are ridiculous but they don’t even appear negative. Another thing lacking is at no point did the intelligence community ever say they found or heard anything from the Chinese government in surveillance indicating there was a leak much less a bioweapons program or plot at the lab.

Posted
4 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Let’s say I have a psychological syndrome where I am so deranged (disconnected from reality) about anything Trump touches or looks at. Fine. Even ***I believe & have full faith & belief in my President & his administration that if he and they really truly believed these claims about treason, bioweapons, criminal conspiracy, and coordination with enemies that have thousands of nuclear weapons pointed at us, resulting in a million American deaths, that he would follow this path to the end of the Earth to punish these traitors.

Let’s watch shall we, as federal agents swarm across the country to seize the guilty. 

There is zero doubt you have a condition. You know it. It ruined a good amount of your personal life. You recognize it, unlike Tim, and try to take time away....but you can't. Its a big part of your being now. You are certifiable. 

Posted
50 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Jerry:  Biden suddenly became progressive.

Caine:  Prove it!  Be specific!

Jerry:  Proves it.

Caine:  Not fair!  He made speeches, he changed, he loved transing the kids like many centrist Democrats!

 

Since I gave you the courtesy of specifics including a link, perhaps you'll give me the courtesy of a link to video of him on these speeches?  I'm not really doubting he was told to go up and read the words, but I'd like to see what he looks like advocating for hormone blockers for children.  :thumbsup: 

Nah. I’m not looking for links for old Biden speeches. I remember hearing him talk about it but I’m not going to spend my Saturday time looking it up. If you want to assume that’s a win for you fine. I think your argument here is very weak. 

Posted
1 hour ago, JuneJuly said:

There is zero doubt you have a condition.

Great I have {whispering} “The STD.” I 100% believe if Trump believes it Trump would be pursuing every avenue to bring the Chinese & American perpetrators of what would be per Gabbard one of the world’s great historic crimes. But I have STD because I believe that while you do not because you believe he would do nothing.

Posted
9 hours ago, Caine Mutiny said:

My view on Dr. Fauci is that he is a hero, completely undeserving of the treatment he has received, and will hopefully go down in history as a great man. 
 

Guess I’m no moderate…

 

9 hours ago, Caine Mutiny said:

There’s no reason to assume this. He was slow and not always with it (see our current President as well) but there is no evidence that anyone else made important decisions for him and I don’t believe it. Without evidence it’s not a “moderate take.” 

This person has to be the most gullible person on the planet.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Right Biden was slow & demented but Trump was the guy who appointed & pushed the 5’4” perpetrator of an historic global crime every day for 4 months without a whisp of awareness of the mass international conspiracy swirling around him. Got it.

Posted
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

But you started out your theory by saying he “wasn’t running things by the end of his term.”  Your evidence of this is something that happened in 2022?

That's a fair observation.  I was being kind with the "end of term" comment.  I posted here from before the 2020 election stating that Biden was clearly compromised.

53 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

Nah. I’m not looking for links for old Biden speeches. I remember hearing him talk about it but I’m not going to spend my Saturday time looking it up. If you want to assume that’s a win for you fine. I think your argument here is very weak. 

Probably just as well, since you don't read the links you post anyway.

Scranton Joe the Catholic wanted to trans the kids, whee!

When you are ready we can move on to his immigration policies.  :thumbsup: 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Great I have {whispering} “The STD.” I 100% believe if Trump believes it Trump would be pursuing every avenue to bring the Chinese & American perpetrators of what would be per Gabbard one of the world’s great historic crimes. But I have STD because I believe that while you do not because you believe he would do nothing.

Wat?

Just listen to yourself.  Good grief. 

 

 

 

 

Hint: I never said what I believe on the topic.  That should be proof of your delusion.  

Posted

A “gotcha” from a politician is not going to give answers on this. It will come from the study of the virus itself.

Unfortunately, China doesn’t want to share much of the info they have.

Scientific consensus is that this virus occurred naturally and jumped from animals to humans. The main reason they aren’t ruling out the unlikely lab leak hypothesis is that China won’t give up their data. If they did, I suspect that theory would be permanently put to rest… Among scientists anyway. I’m sure the conspiracy clowns will never let it go.

Posted
16 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Right, it’s a complete mystery what a Trump follower might think of the Wuhan Flu. 

Delusional 

Poster child for TDS.  

PROOF:

I believe in free abortions for everyone that wants one. I believe in climate change. Yet you think you know what I think about this topic that I haven't even commented on. 

One last time:  SEEK HELP. 

Posted
4 hours ago, JuneJuly said:

I believe in climate change.

Climate change is real. MMGW isn't real.   You know this, tho

I'm not taking you out of context. just how you responded to Saints post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...