Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, SUXBNME said:

Climate change is real. MMGW isn't real.   You know this, tho

I'm not taking you out of context. just how you responded to Saints post

Point taken.  I don't know if mmgw is real or not though.  

  • Haha 1
Posted
9 hours ago, JuneJuly said:

Wat?

Just listen to yourself.  Good grief. 

 

 

 

 

Hint: I never said what I believe on the topic.  That should be proof of your delusion.  

So what do you believe?

And has Bill Gates been “indicated” yet? 🤣

On 10/23/2024 at 10:40 PM, Horseman said:

October Surprise!

After donating 50 million to Kackala, Bill Gates is indicated in the Netherlands for lying about the dangers of the Covid vaccine. 

 

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

MSM is burying this story so their mouth breather consumers won’t notice 

 

 

 

 

What were the new communications?  Can you provide some screenshots please?  Thanks in advance 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

ABC, CBS, NBC have not covered this story. So weird.

Because it’s not a story. Just more kindling for the conspiracy theory bonfire. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Because it’s not a story. Just more kindling for the conspiracy theory bonfire. 

Trust MSM with all of your heart. It has done you wonders up until now.

  • Like 2
Posted
12 hours ago, JuneJuly said:

I believe in free abortions for everyone that wants one. I believe in climate change.

Through what gestation, the period set out by Roe? Any time?

I think the question is what causes climate change, what are the effects & what to do about it, though, yeah I guess many Trump followers say look it snowed somewhere in April today so climate change isn’t real. 

But since you raised it, do you agree with the summary of this article?

Climate change increases cross-species viral transmission risk

This article is fully available, how about this one?:

Climate change, its impact on emerging infectious diseases and new technologies to combat the challenge

 

Posted
1 hour ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Through what gestation, the period set out by Roe? Any time?

 

Kill your offspring any time you want.  Natural selection.  

Posted
7 minutes ago, JuneJuly said:

Kill your offspring any time you want.  Natural selection.  

Thank you for your response. Fwiw that position isn’t really at odds with being right wing. Parts of the extreme right believe in eugenics as social policy in just this way. It just means that you’re not an evangelical type. Almost all self identifying evangelicals  are Maga but not all Maga are evangelical.

Posted
2 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Thank you for your response. Fwiw that position isn’t really at odds with being right wing. Parts of the extreme right believe in eugenics as social policy in just this way. It just means that you’re not an evangelical type. Almost all self identifying evangelicals  are Maga but not all Maga are evangelical.

The founder of Planned Parenthood was MAGA?  Who knew?

Posted
9 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Thank you for your response. Fwiw that position isn’t really at odds with being right wing. Parts of the extreme right believe in eugenics as social policy in just this way. It just means that you’re not an evangelical type. Almost all self identifying evangelicals  are Maga but not all Maga are evangelical.

You can stick your broad paint brush up your psychotic asss.  

Posted
13 minutes ago, Strike said:

The founder of Planned Parenthood was MAGA?  Who knew?

I suppose. Margaret Singer was definitely a eugenicist. If you want to call it a pre-turn of the century view fine.

Posted
Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said:

I suppose. Margaret Singer was definitely a eugenicist. If you want to call it a pre-turn of the century view fine.

It's just funny how all of the things you libs constantly accuse non lefties of without evidence your side is literally guilty of throughout it's existence.  You guys just rewrite history when reminded of those transgressions.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Strike said:

It's just funny how all of the things you libs constantly accuse non lefties of without evidence your side is literally guilty of throughout it's existence.  You guys just rewrite history when reminded of those transgressions.

I did agree with you. I think there are other areas where ideologies have shifted parties too over the years. Sanger is a perfectly valid point to raise vs PP, though I doubt they advocate for unlimited abortion, natural selection or eugenics now. 

Posted
4 hours ago, TimHauck said:

So what do you believe?

And has Bill Gates been “indicated” yet? 🤣

 

Bill Gates, the pedophile?  That’s your guy?

Posted
7 hours ago, TimHauck said:

On 10/23/2024 at 9:40 PM,  Horseman said:

October Surprise!

Bill Gates is indicated in the Netherlands for lying about the dangers of the Covid vaccine.

^ OP by 6-7. Gates was sued in NL (along with the Dutch government), that’s all. It is probably a good example of what’s going on here as the OP in this thread is from ZeroHedge, which lord knows who or what runs that garbage from what country.

Posted
2 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

^ OP by 6-7. Gates was sued in NL, that’s all. It is probably a good example of what’s going on here as the OP in this thread is from ZeroHedge, which lord knows who or what runs that garbage from what country.

To be fair, ZeroHedge did at least link to the actual documents.  But I haven’t really seen any outlets claim there’s any particular smoking gun in there or much if anything that we didn’t already know.   The closest I could find was this article from the Daily Caller, but I don’t really see anything “explosive” here

https://dailycallernewsfoundation.org/2026/06/19/the-fauci-files-five-explosive-findings-declassified-by-tulsi-gabbard/

Posted
16 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

To be fair, ZeroHedge did at least link to the actual documents.  But I haven’t really seen any outlets claim there’s any particular smoking gun in there or much if anything that we didn’t already know.   The closest I could find was this article from the Daily Caller, but I don’t really see anything “explosive” here

https://dailycallernewsfoundation.org/2026/06/19/the-fauci-files-five-explosive-findings-declassified-by-tulsi-gabbard/

There’s no ODNI report is there? Just documents?

Posted
2 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

There’s no ODNI report is there? Just documents?

Sorry, it linked to the ODNI report, which linked to the documents 

Posted
5 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Sorry, it linked to the ODNI report, which linked to the documents 

Fwiw that’s not a report. That’s a webpage with claims & conclusions leading to loosely assorted docs.

Posted
23 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Thank you for your response. Fwiw that position isn’t really at odds with being right wing. Parts of the extreme right believe in eugenics as social policy in just this way. It just means that you’re not an evangelical type. Almost all self identifying evangelicals  are Maga but not all Maga are evangelical.

Eugenics is more a leftist machine; more progressive and a social construct to try and get rid of poverty and crime. Liberals and progressives just hide it behind pro-choice and body-autonomy. 

  • Confused 1
Posted
Just now, TheNewGirl said:

Eugenics is more a leftist machine; more progressive and a social construct to try and get rid of poverty and crime. Liberals and progressives just hide it behind pro-choice and body-autonomy. 

Really. You think leftists talk about natural selection as a means of ordering government and the genomic nature of “race” as a determinor for behavior?

Btw Strike was absolutely right about Sanger. Totally fair comment.

Posted
31 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Really. You think leftists talk about natural selection as a means of ordering government and the genomic nature of “race” as a determinor for behavior?

Btw Strike was absolutely right about Sanger. Totally fair comment.

Please take the time to read about the history of eugenics; going back to the 1800s, and where it started in the US. 

It seems that one of the MOs of the GC is to just spout what they think they know, without a modicum of research or knowledge of the history of a set of beliefs. It just fits the narrative NOW and that's all that matters.

Never mind that eugenics was a huge, key part of the progressive era and when it started. 

Please read more than just current media. 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

Please take the time to read about the history of eugenics; going back to the 1800s, and where it started in the US. 

It seems that one of the MOs of the GC is to just spout what they think they know, without a modicum of research or knowledge of the history of a set of beliefs. It just fits the narrative NOW and that's all that matters.

Never mind that eugenics was a huge, key part of the progressive era and when it started. 

Please read more than just current media. 

 

My crackah! :wub:

Posted
21 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

Please take the time to read about the history of eugenics; going back to the 1800s, and where it started in the US. 

It seems that one of the MOs of the GC is to just spout what they think they know, without a modicum of research or knowledge of the history of a set of beliefs. It just fits the narrative NOW and that's all that matters.

Never mind that eugenics was a huge, key part of the progressive era and when it started. 

Please read more than just current media. 

 

I’ve read a fair bit on eugenics through my interest in history. A lot of it is European, specifically out of Vienna & Trieste, but in America there was Henry Ford (who was not I’m sure you’ll agree a progressive) and some common beliefs stemming from the European line of thought. There was Darwin & Malthus which also affected things going back some time. 

Im certainly interested in the discussion. And as I’ve said several times yes eugenics was once considered “progressive” but as you know we have been through an awful lot - as in horrific, grotesque - awful lot in the US & the west on that score & since at least the 1920s, & it has been neither part of the conservative normliberal/progressive argument since.

And you have to be careful here because if you want a shortcut to eugenics you should look at racial theory in Southern racial laws roughly 1865-1950s. And those principles exist today in the very extreme right which is where eugenics lives *today as well.

This discussion is way off track btw. 6-7 just raised it to defend his claim he doesn’t hold predictable maga beliefs on Covid, & he hasn’t bothered since.

Posted

What scares me the most about these idiots is this: there may be another pandemic, far more deadly than COVID, in our lifetimes. And our safety and survival will depend on listening to the health authorities and following their instructions. And some of you guys won’t and millions will die. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
35 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

What scares me the most about these idiots is this: there may be another pandemic, far more deadly than COVID, in our lifetimes. 

Really?  I thought Fauci retired didn't he?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...