siran808

I myself am opposed to rejecting any trade that is made at arm's length - unless it is outright rediculous. I'm not sure if it reaches that level here. Although I agree that the trade is unfair, let me argue for the commish: Basically the other team is 2-5 and needs points now. The "losing" team is receiving the league's #3 wr (18 ppw), a bonafide RB in Taylor (14ppg) , and the league's #3 D - the TE's are a wash. The losing team will be able to play them right away. In return the commish is getting LJ (24 ppg) and Johnson/Fitz (lets say 13 ppg - Johnson is Ave 9 poitns) so this is a fair trade mathmatically. Plus Fitz and Johnson are out next week on a bye. Does this make a difference? Again I don't like the deal, it stinks, but not sure if I should push to overturn it.. Any more thoughts would be appreciated

the following trade was made by our commishioner and approved by him which has caused an uproar. Team A gets: Larry Johnson, Fitzgerald, Bryant Johnson, Dophins D (then dropped), and McMichael (TE required league) Team B: Darrell Jackson, Fred Taylor, Vikings D (#3 overall) and Cooley. Should this be overturned?

I would go with Maroney, based on talent, and anticipated number of carries.

Would you trade Owens and Delhomme for Alexander and Stallworth? I am currently 6-0 and can take a gamble of Alexander and Stallworth sitting for a few more weeks. This would leave me weak at WR, but I like Stallworth's potential. Before he was hurt he had two very good games, and in his absence McNabvb has produced other high scoring WRS - I anticipate that Stallworth will be his primary receiver when he returns. I can start 4! Rbs in the league and this would give me a great RB stable of LJ, S. Jackson, Chester Taylor and Alexander. But only Randy Moss, Jennings, and Stallworth of note at WR Thoughts? Leave Link

Ignore

I'm in trade talks with another team and am trying to decide if I want Stallworth or Glenn. I believe Glenn is the safer pick (and "ranked" higher in most rankings), but I am high on Stallworth's potential once he returns. In particular the Eagles WRs have each had their big games in his absence and I believe that once Stallworth returns he will be the primary receiver again- and the benefit of McNabb's greatness this year. Thoughs? Leave Link

Would you trade Owens and Delhomme for S. Alexander? I am 6-0 and an willing to wait for Alexander to return. However this would leave me weak at WR. However, i can start 4 rbs and going into the playoffs I would have Jackson, LJ, Chester Taylor and Alexander - in particular Alexander has a great scheudle throughout the playoffs. Thoughts?

Would you trade away Cadillac and Maroney away for S. Jackson and TO? I'm in a league where we can start 4 rbs and would normally start Cadillac and Maroney. Jackson is the best player in this deal, but I have reservations about TO. Cadillac of course has a brutal schedule. thanks - leave link

MY only concern with Chad is his lack of production thus far, and that he has a brutal Playoff schedule. Andre has either average or easy games from hereon out. Does that change your outlook?

All this talk about TO not getting along with the coaching staff is atarting to worry me. Would you trade him away for Andre Johnson? The same owner also has Chad Johnson - Would you rather trade fro him? Thanks

I am a washington owner and will be starting him. You never know how much Henry will split witH Brown and White. Please See Mine

I've been made the following offer: I get: Steven Jackson, Owens, Barlow, and Brad Johnson for Maroney, Cadillac, Pitmann, and Delhomme The way I see it- Jackson is better than Maroney (Adv Me) Cadillac and Owens - (slight advantage other team) He gets Pittman to back up Caddy, I get Barlow since I have L. Washington Delhomme is slightly better than Johnson even though they have similar points thus far My main concern is that my league scoring slightly favors RB and given that we can start 4 rbs they are always in demand. and this would leave me "Weak" at RB with three - albeit studly RBs. I generally started 4 rbs but now will start three and need three WRs (Jennings, Owens, and Moss). Plus I'm not sure if I'm sold on Owens. Tell me I'm overanalyzing this and it really is a great deal as I initially saw it... Thoughts? Will ans yours -------------------- 12 Team, Standard Scoring, redraft 1 qb, 2rb, 2wr, 2 flex - wr/rb/ or TE (I can start 4 rbs) QB: Bulger, Brad Johnson RB: Larry Johnson, Chester Taylor WR: Randy Moss, Mason Flex: two best of Cadillac Williams, Maroney, DeAngelo Williams, Greg Jennings, Troy Williamson, Leon Washinton

Assuming Fitgerald will be out for a signifigant period of time I would not do the trade - Keep Galloway and Barlow. In my eyes this is a question of whether you rather have Galloway or Fitz who might be hurt. See Mine

I've been made the following offer: I get: Steven Jackson, Owens, Barlow, and Brad Johnson for Maroney, Cadillac, Pitmann, and Delhomme The way I see it- Jackson is better than Maroney (Adv Me) Cadillac and Owens are even He gets Pittman to back up Caddy, I get Barlow since I have L. Washington Delhomme is slightly better than Johnson even though they have similar points thus far Thoughts? Will ans yours

Last week I offered Cadillac for Owens and was turned down. The other owner is now inquiring if I would be interested in the trade - but now i'm not so sure. Consensus on this board last week was I should definately trade Cadillac for Owens? Do I still do it? Caddy does have a brutal schedule? I want to trade for a proven commodity but short of Holt and Boldin (who I can't trade for) this year none of the high drafted WRs are excelling. Thanks in advance