A Dido Brother 0 Posted October 5, 2006 OK, I've been tryin to wheel and deal to upgrade at RB. You can see why with my lineup: QB - Palmer RB - Edge, Jamal, Droughns, Barlow WR - Hines, SaMoss, ReWilliams, TWilliamson, JHorn, BEdwards WR/TE - Colston TE - Shockey K - VJagt Def - Balt The guy I've been negotiating with has the following: QB - PManning, Grossman RB - Gore,CTaylor,Dunn,RBrown WR - KJohnson, JWalker, LEvans, JCotchery K - Wilkins,Viniateri Def - Atl, KC I initially offered ReWilliams and Barlow for CTaylor. He isn't stupid so he didn't take it and instead countered with CTaylor and Evans for Colston. Colston has too much value as a WR/TE flex (we start 3 WR and 1 TE) for me to give up, plus he's the only receiver I have who consistently produces good numbers. So, I countered with Hines for CTaylor straight up. Should I retract and offer SaMoss instead? To me, this is a win-win situation. Hines has good long term potential to help his WR corps (as Ben returns to form and his hammy heals) and CTaylor has the long term potential to beef up my RBs. I think WR1 for RB2 is a good deal, but I'm just wondering who's better to lose - Ward or SaMoss? Let me hear your thoughts, leave a link and I'll answer your question with my thoughts... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WXguy35 0 Posted October 5, 2006 OK, I've been tryin to wheel and deal to upgrade at RB. You can see why with my lineup: QB - Palmer RB - Edge, Jamal, Droughns, Barlow WR - Hines, SaMoss, ReWilliams, TWilliamson, JHorn, BEdwards WR/TE - Colston TE - Shockey K - VJagt Def - Balt The guy I've been negotiating with has the following: QB - PManning, Grossman RB - Gore,CTaylor,Dunn,RBrown WR - KJohnson, JWalker, LEvans, JCotchery K - Wilkins,Viniateri Def - Atl, KC I initially offered ReWilliams and Barlow for CTaylor. He isn't stupid so he didn't take it and instead countered with CTaylor and Evans for Colston. Colston has too much value as a WR/TE flex (we start 3 WR and 1 TE) for me to give up, plus he's the only receiver I have who consistently produces good numbers. So, I countered with Hines for CTaylor straight up. Should I retract and offer SaMoss instead? To me, this is a win-win situation. Hines has good long term potential to help his WR corps (as Ben returns to form and his hammy heals) and CTaylor has the long term potential to beef up my RBs. I think WR1 for RB2 is a good deal, but I'm just wondering who's better to lose - Ward or SaMoss? Let me hear your thoughts, leave a link and I'll answer your question with my thoughts... When did you offer Barlow? He has been putting up decent #'s for the past 2 weeks and should be ok trade bait...I would think...Reggie is kind of a bum offer though...J-ville O can be suspect at times. You want Chester Taylor obviously....which he is unwilling to trade as it appears. Go after Dunn, with Duckett gone and Norwood a little banged up he will get the ball a lot...especially when they review how little they have run incomparison to Vick trying to chuck something up. Here is my suggestion.... Offer up Moss and Barlow for Dunn and Walker/KJ(one or the other) Here's why: Moss had a huge week last week, but don't expect Brunell to find him that often and for teams to be such bad tacklers... Barlow will flatten out with Washington emerging in the backfield...You know that, they don't. The other thing is Dunn hasn't put up a rushing TD yet, so his points are low and value seems low too. It is not low by any means! Walker is going to get the ball now that Denver has got themselves back on track and the running game is a little less crappy. KJ's value will go down in skeptics eyes that he will lose catches due to Smith's return. Not true! it will actually help him get more open and see more passes with Smith getting doubled up! So try either KJ or Walker in that multi player trade. Thanks for your help! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
