F.Gore&L.Evans for R.Droughns&M.Colston

[nosferatu9368 0]

I'd be getting Droughns & Colston

Is this a good idea or would I be weakening my RB's too much?

Team in signature

 

Leave a Link

 

Good Luck

 

Thanks for your help

 

Peace...

[ffsmack 0]

Thats a tough one, but I think I would stay put. You said it, I think it weakens your RBs a bit much and you have good WRs and the upgrade to Colston may not be as big as the downgrade to Droughns.

 

Thanks for mine.

[Dol-Fan 0]

Definitely stay put. You are already balanced now, why make yourself weak in any position?

[surfnturf3g01 0]

Do you start 2 or 3 WR's and can you use Colston as the TE position (some leagues are allowing that)??? These are all factors I would have to consider before telling you one way or the other...

[nosferatu9368 0]

We start 3 and TE's count as WR's in our league.

 

Thanks for answering

 

Good Luck

 

Peace...

[Cuse9 131]

Noway can you trade Gore. Colston has been dynamite this year, but not as good as Gore.

 

Here is what Gore has left.

Det, Sea, StL, NO, GB, Sea, Ariz, Den-(if you play 17 weeks)

 

Seattle is tough, but vs the others there is no reason to think he can't put up massive numbers. I really like the potential of getting to the championship game and having Gore play Zona!!

 

Keep what you got...it will pay off in the playoffs.

 

Good luck.......check mine please.

[Gelucy44 0]

Yeah man, your team looks pretty good right now, but I dont see how you can go wrong with colston, he is amazing. I would pull the trigger. Also I dont know if Gore can hold up in the second half.

[Wiserman20 0]

Your basically getting Colston for Gore and Evans....

 

No way!

 

Gore will get more points than Colston for the remainder of the year no matter how hot Maurice is...

 

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=252525