mec411 0 Posted September 14, 2007 If I offer the guy Housh and Foster for TO, his backs are Jacobs and Lendale, he has NO depth at RB and still has Boldin. Would he do it? ill help you Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeyt7 1 Posted September 14, 2007 I wouldnt do it If I were him, but its a good effort http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=287109 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
treewarden 1 Posted September 14, 2007 You realize you'll have zero RB depth w/o Foster? I'd shop TO for a better RB than Foster (RBBC), but you never know how desperate he might be... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bobpate17 0 Posted September 14, 2007 tell you the truth I wouldn't do it. but it also depends on how dry WW is. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=287100 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mec411 0 Posted September 14, 2007 tell you the truth I wouldn't do it. but it also depends on how dry WW is. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=287100 its a 14 tema league, and we have a terrible league where fa can be gotten in the middle of a game on sunday which leaves the ww dry...and it is bone dry..and now that im thinking about it, i may not do it, my rbs would be baren...though to is an upgrade over housh, no? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
emartin 0 Posted September 14, 2007 I wouldnt do it if I were you. Owens and Housh are both top 10 WR's in my opinion and I think Foster might have a few good weeks. Depth is not a bad thing to have. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mec411 0 Posted September 14, 2007 bump..ill respond Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bauman88 0 Posted September 14, 2007 I'd rather have TO Thanks! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Pauly 0 Posted September 14, 2007 I'd say stand pat. The Cowboys Offense looked unstoppable against the lowly Giants, I'd give them at least one more week to see how things go. I also agree with the other posters about preserving running back depth on your part. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dbuofi7 0 Posted September 14, 2007 I agree with the rest - you're opening yourself up to some issues at RB by losing Foster. Housh isn't that much of a downgrade from TO. Please see mine: http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=287019 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
horsepower43 0 Posted September 14, 2007 to is better than both of those guys COMBINED but you always miss 100% of the shots you don't take if i were him id be offended Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
COACHG137 0 Posted September 14, 2007 I like to have RB depth .TJ should have another good year . I would stay put unless you can get another rb Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mec411 0 Posted September 15, 2007 I like to have RB depth .TJ should have another good year . I would stay put unless you can get another rb yeah i think im staying put, i think housh has at least 80 rec and 1000 9tds this year (conservative rec and yards i think)...not too much worse than what i think TO will have (90, 1200, 11) and not enough to kill my rb depth, i at least will have a viable starter to plug in on bye weeks, without him, i have sammie morris, woo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites