Big Fella 0 Posted October 23, 2009 Not too high on either but I have to say LJ. Mike Bell is no higher than the third guy on the depth chart in New Orleans. LJ might not be too productive but he is still the primary ball carrier in KC. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
slestack11 0 Posted October 23, 2009 Larry Johnson is a starter so I'd go with him. Saints seem to always get passing TD's even when they're in the redzone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smartgenius 0 Posted October 23, 2009 I generally agree with the "go with the starter" theory, but I make exceptions for players on anemic teams (the Chiefs) when backups on top offenses (the Saints) often do better. Neither will be a stud week in and week out, but Bell gets some goalline carries, and if Thomas gets dinged again you have a top 10 back. High risk/high reward vs. Low risk/low reward.... Thanks for seeing mine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jdibella 0 Posted October 23, 2009 I'd go with Larry Johnson. As others have mentioned, Bell is 3rd on the depth chart and although he gets touches he doesn't get as many as LJ. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites