joeyjoejoe

I'm here all day! Woohoo!

I will be paying on May 15th....payday.

How you guys feel about the diffs. in scoring between the RB's and WR's? #1 RB Priest = 361...#1 Wr Harrison = 232. Only 3 Wr's scored over 200 pts. Quite a difference. I propose we it HP scoring with a pt a reception to even things out between the RB's and WR's. Otherwise there is almost no point in starting a WR in the flex spot. 3rd RB's will almost always put up better numbers than your #3 WR. Last season Shipp put up just over 150 total pts....so did Driver, Rice, Coles and Booker. Totally uneven. If you're fine with things the way they are, thats cool too....it just means my first three (or 4) picks will be RB/RB/RB. So vote below for adding 1pt/rec (WR's & RB's & TE's)to our scoring system...Yay or Nay. [ 03-28-2003: Message edited by: joeyjoejoe ]

I like it too! I can still get a solid stud at 5th and the 20th pick is nicer than my 23rd (of course). Basically I get 6 picks in the top 50...works for me!

I'm on the fence about it. I sent you an offer but I think we're not even on the same page. The more I think about it...the more I like my #2 pick. I believe there are 3 Backs i'd like to have for the next few years and going second guarantees I get one of them. Going 5th means I have to take a chance that one of my 3 slips to 5th or I take my chances with someone i'm less than confident about.

19th for me too

5th pick...what are you offering? [ 03-06-2003: Message edited by: joeyjoejoe ]

Ditto wait.

Wooohooo!!!! Thx Mike! [ 02-20-2003: Message edited by: joeyjoejoe ]