luckyheel317

TE production is so random outside of the top 2 that I would not go crazy....I don't think either is a huge upgrade, despite each of their last games, so, maybe $10 on one or the other. Fleener is a better option, in my opinion. Could you comment on my post? http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=458498

Yeah, they are pretty high on Brady....it would likely cost me Bell, who I got in a steal of a trade a few weeks ago (Bell for Ware and KBenjamin). Not sure that would be worth it for me.

I know this is too late, but regardless of Langford's injury last night, I would have dropped DeAndre. The writing was already on the wall for Langford and he and Howard were already basically splitting time. In Oakland, Murray is the clear #1 and even if he went down and Washington took over, I don't think he would produce. Sucks that you dropped Langford, but, that's the way it works out. I also didn't think you needed to pick up Siemien with the three you have on your roster....sure, Manning doesn't have the ideal matchup next week and you'd have to start both he and Bortles, but I think Manning will still produce. Besides, Bortles may cover for him versus that horrific Indy defense. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=458470

I'm not sold either way.... Jones will be a stud the rest of the season...look at Detroit's opponents the rest of the way....CHI(2), PHI, LA, WAS, NO(2) JAX, DAL and I think he'll outscore Landry by a good amount the rest of the year. Jennings just is not an every down back for me and the TDs aren't there. Lacy will surely get yards, but, make no mistake, this is Rodgers team and GB will thrive passing the ball and using the run to keep the defenses in check. Landry is good, but it will all depend on Tannehill...and I like Detroit's remaining schedule over Miami's for the QB. So, Jones is clearly better than Landry, in my opinion and Lacy is clearly better than Jennings...makes it a wash...in those instances, I'd keep the better player and in this deal, it's Jones. Please check out mine: http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=458470

I like Ware, but, as a clear #2, Williams is in a better situation. I say keep him. Please help with mine http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=458470

I say do it. Sure, the steelers combo, right now, is the best RB situation out there. That said, Thomas just went over 100yds receiving for the first time in like 15 games...he's not a #1 in my opinion and he's a mid to low tier #2. Who knows what Gordon will look like in CLE, especially with the QB situation. Jeffrey is a #1, high level #2 at worst. Gurley is a #1 and LA will realize again, what they have in him, and he'll have games just like yesterday more often than not. In Murray, who knows, but, he's got a TD in every game so far this year...at least he's got that going for him. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=458470

12 team ESPN PPR non-keeper league - QB, 2RB, 3WR, TE, K, DEF with 7 reserve slots Here are my picks: Bryant Lacy Ellington Jeffrey MFloyd Romo Vereen MWallace Rivers Ertz Tampa Dan Bailey Ridley Hartline Baldwin TWest I think it's pretty solid...there was a run on QB early, but I stayed on course with RB/WR in the first 4 rounds...since most had a QB, I picked my 3rd WR in Rd 5 and then went for QB...Kap was available, but I went with Romo...I think he could have a bounce back year. Defenses were gone early too, so I waited on those as well...I plan on swapping as needed, so, I'm not concerned about those. I think I got solid guys from 13-16. One of Ridley or Vereen should take the main snaps before too long in NE, giving me potential trade bait. Hartline is a solid bye week filler, if not better and West is a pretty good sleeper. Thoughts??

Thanks for the analysis, 49er. Awesome job.

what he said

Graham. He's essentially a WR at your TE spot and there's only one other (J Thomas) who may approach his stats and he likely won't be available if you pass on Graham and take Bryant (who you should take if you decide to pick a WR). Thomas and Nelson are a more than solid 1-2 punch at WR, though.

I think I meet your requirements... http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?s=321d41e47ce89090a5b0b439e25e732a&showtopic=435051

I don't know your league, but I don't think Gore + Cobb gets you a top 10 RB. You're a 12 team league which means some team will be asking themselves a similar question you are...do I trade my stud RB for a top 10 WR and a borderline top 20 RB. Oh, and Jennings is by no means a sure thing either.

Yeah, totally agree with everyone.... The hardest part about this team for you this year is picking the right stud each week. I mean a 2RB and 2WR league and 4 of of Ball/Bell/Edelman/Cooper/Williams will be sitting each week.... Good luck...you won't need it.

Solid I actually like Cruz this year...Manning HAS to rebound somewhat, doesn't he?? And, he's going to look to his best receiver to help get out of the funk....that being said, I like Cobb and Floyd better as your #1, #2. Britt could surprise this year and be a solid #3 if Cruz doesn't work out. I like the running QBs...a touchdown is a touchdown and adding the rushing yards is a plus. I like Cam better than Kap this year, but rotate and play the match-ups. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=435051

I don't play in football auction leagues, but, I have 15 years experience in baseball auctions. Based on that, I can't imagine Charles or Bryant going for much, if any, more than those prices. It's about value and between Ball and Thomas, you have a crap load of value there (Thomas $2 vs $22 and Ball $12 vs $29). I say Ball and Thomas and use the extra to get Charles or Bryant back if you have to have them. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=435051

Agreed.

I agree with the above posters. Nice solid starters and I like your gamble picks. I don't understand the reason you have to have a second TE since you're starting one, but I trust it's in the rules. Overall, good solid team, but, as tant said above, I'd scour the waivers early to see if there are better gambles out there.

I never like starting 2 WR from the same team, especially a team with a strong RB, which Lacy will clearly be for them. Brees is clearly an upgrade from Wilson, but that plus the drop from McCoy to Gore and the fact that Jeffrey is not a significant upgrade from ANY of your 3 WR means that overall the deal is a push. Essentially, you will be sitting a productive WR every week (byes excluded). So the deal turns into Brees/Gore for Wilson/McCoy. I say sit tight.