-
Content Count
208 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
13 GoodAbout mccmw
-
Rank
FF Geek
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Waller is available...it looks like he has a 50/50 shot of activation and playing this week. For Week 13 specifically, would you still stick with Loveland against the Philly defense?
-
I was a LaPorta owner...lost for season. I picked up Loveland, who did well this past week...but I'm not sure that is sustainable alongside Kmet. Scanning the waiver wire I see: Hill (might split carries with Neal too?) Fannin Jr (don't know if Njoku will reclaim #1) Likely (conflicts with Andrews) Strange (Lawrence has used/needed TEs in the past) Ertz (I've seen him used in a few games...but the Commanders are unsteady right now) Wright (too many other Detroit mouths to feed) Gesicki (too many mouths to feed...but may get more action with Higgins out?) Thoughts?
-
Yep...that sounds worth it.
-
I have a solid stash of WRs - Smith-Njigba, Rice, Collins, Adams, Waddle, and Higgins RBs...not bad but not much bench depth...Taylor, Gibbs, Jones, and Hubbard (and Mixon and Benson stashed in RES spots should they come back) I'm not sure of the reason but someone has dropped Garrett Wilson. Would you drop Higgins or Waddle for Wilson. Waddle is the WR1 now and will continue to get looks. Higgins seemed to be building repoir with Flacco. Wilson is extremely talented...but Fields has issues. Also, do you see Marks with more future upside to Hubbard? Both are in timeshares but Dowdle is much better than Chubb. WHIR.
-
It's a 12-team league. I'll look to stream each week...TEs always hard to judge/draft:) Everyone has a great single game during the season but there is little consistency:) I think Ferguson, McBride, and Warren seem to be this year's exceptions thus far. Goedert right after.
-
Mark Andrews owner in a league. With the exception of one game, he's done nothing...with or without Lamar. Likely coming back after bye week could further diminish his potential. Waiver options are limited. I need to get someone for this week at a minimum. Who to drop Andrews for...someone has dropped Hockenson and while he hasn't been the TE he has been, I'm tempted to try and get him. Otherwise, the other options are Otton, Engram, J. Johnson, and Schultz. Thoughts?
-
Justin Fields has been sitting on my bench and I'm not confident he is worth keeping. Bo Nix is my other QB...underwhelming thus far as well. Waiver options are limited. Who would you drop Fields for: Penix Purdy Rodgers Stroud WHIR
-
Someone has given up on McLaurin and dropped him...he's been hurt (still is). Thoughts on ROS potential? I wouldn't drop anyone else for him except I have Franklin stashed based on the volume he was getting with the Broncos. I'm tempted to grab McLaurin in the hope that when he comes back from injury he'll have synergy with Daniels. Thoughts?
-
Who do you think is the next starter and most upside between these two?
-
Don't trade...please don't trade. By chance, is the other team a beginner...and a die-hard Packers fan? It looks like they drafted based on their "real-team favorite" rather than fantasy football strategy:)
-
Thoughts on who has most potential/upside for ROS? I currently have Waddle...Allen is available.
-
I went ahead and grabbed Benson.
-
I assume that if people are dropping players like Jones, that you have minimal bench spots? And that either they had used their IR spot...or didn't know how to use it (e.g. beginner). Assuming you can stay competitive for four weeks (and Kittle possibly returning early/on time so you can move Jones into the IR spot) Tracy or Giddens would be who I'd swap for him.
-
Standard set up....2RBs, 2WRs, 1Flex.
-
I would go Etienne this week in flex...Atlanta defense off to a decent start this year but Hubbard isn't a bad choice either. Likewise, not bad WR options. Any of the three has great potential. While it is natural to go Ladd, Tyrod isn't "bad" and G. Wilson could do well....especially in the second half if the Jets are behind.
