RogerDodger

Tim Ballard didn't make the movie and as far as I understand isn't making money off ticket sales. Nice to see inside the workings of that tiny mind. No wonder you're lost.

A - It's not Tim Ballard's movie B - I need to see proof of the bold before I believed Angel Studios would funnel money to OUR. C - Yes OUR is asking for donations using the movie, don't donate if you don't want. I cannot confirm the credits, I thought it was just pay it forward tickets.

Can you read? Try the second sentence one more time.

WTF are you talking about? It was a St. Timothy charm necklace. Get it - St. Timothy - TIM Ballard. Why do you have to make everything so stupid.

I understood fine. IDGAF about Tim Ballard. The movie largely follows Tim Ballard's origin story. They (the pod cast you've listened to) claim that his origin story is not 100% true. Things like: There was no necklace. The boy was really from America (not Columbia) and got stopped at the Mexican border because they forgot his ID when the rapist took him down to Mexico to have fun. They didn't have to go rescue his sister too, she was safe at home. If the podcasters are correct, the changes to the story are fine for the movie. Not ok if you're pushing the origin story as true for donations.

He lost that argument when he used US statistics when that has zero to do with the movie (idgaf about Tim Ballard). The movie is clearly about international child trafficking from South America. If people tune off with child abuse at home here in the US because of this movie they're idiots.

Right. Hear that @GutterBoy the movie is based on a true story with a lot of things that are actually true in it: I think we agree. If the MOVIE made up things like the necklace for dramatic effect that's ok. If they decide to go rescue the girl in Columbia when in reality she's safe at home, knock yourself out. If Tim Ballard in real life used the sensational version of the story to raise money that would be fraudulent.

Great, fine. It's the bad guys grifting off the movie, donations to their cause if the cause is found to be disingenuous. But not the actual movie itself which is what Gutterboy and all his links fail to make the distinction. I'll address the other paragraph separately.

Dude. Two simple questions. Let me dumb them down further for you. 1 - How does a fictional movie distract from anything? (Does Hannibal Lector distract from real serial killers because most real serial killings are done by people they know?) <- that's your moronic claim. 2 - What does the website have that disproves Tim's origin story?

It supposed to be "based on a true story" and I never claimed how much of it is true or fiction. But, I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt. Let's say it's 100% fiction. Why does your article say That's nonsensical. Do Hannibal Lecter movies draw attention away from real serial killers? No more fiction crime movies because they draw attention away from real crime! Can you answer one thing about that article you linked? They claim that Tim's origin story is a lie. And maybe it's just the horrible font on that website, but, I don't see the proof they claim to have. They repeat the story and then just say its a lie. How did they draw that conclusion?

The last tweet you posted. Tim Ballard's Sounds of Freedom Directed by Alejandro Monteverde Written by Rod Barr Alejandro Monteverde Produced by Eduardo Verástegui Starring Jim Caviezel Mira Sorvino Bill Camp Don't see anywhere that it's his film. Other than the main character sharing Tim's name, based on his story, which you love to point out as complete fiction. Where is this connection? And don't these guys know it's just fiction!!!! Spiderman draws attention away from real crime!

Obviously peanut is the king of all nuts. Except it's not a nut! Did you know you can dry out the pit of apricots (my favorite fruity fruit) then crack them like an almond to eat their nut? That's would be my favorite.

I thought a long minute about starting a thread about grains/nuts/legumes, but, decided it wasn't worth the sorting out of which are which. However, I'm pretty sure peas fall into seed/legumes more that fruit. I love fresh peas from the pod. Had probably 5 or 6 plants this year and they all get eating fresh - they don't make it to the pot or the freezer.

I could never get into Kiwi and Pomegranates are just too much work.

Fruity Fruits Considering the whole genre it would be hard to go against the Tomato as the King given everything that follows. Avocado mention.

Awesome. X was good. So judging by the trailer Pearl ends up being the old lady in X. And Mia Goth plays Pearl in the prequel and someone else in X. Is that right?

Apricot #1 Plum Banana Black Cherry Raspberry Special mention to Green Apple and Watermelon. Peaches.

Total IQ o/u 250?

Potato hands down. And everyone knows they are the best food source, if allowed only one, when stranded on a desert island. Onions a close second.

Phuk https://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/search/?q=phuk Just embarrassing now, it's ok, just admit you're Ravens Fan. Loser "executive" hoping to retire at 65.

"cultist moron" https://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/search/?q="cultist morons" The biggest moron is the guy that thinks he can pretend to be someone else, someone without ass cancer, and still go around using the same uneducated pre-teen sayings.

Garrett calls himself an executive, but, he's poor and might be able to retire at 65. Executive.

IB4 https://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/search/?q=IB4 An acronym only used by teenage girls and James Daulton, aka Ravens Fan, aka Glory Hole Garrett

"trump cultist" https://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/search/?q="Trump cultist"