WatsonRules

You wanna bet...with RodgerDodger?

Caesar's predicts them to finish fourth in the AFC North

I would have said Browns but I was trying to be honest.

Bengals

Baseless? I would argue that, discounting his politics and the state of his legal issues, he’s a contemptible human being and has been since long before he was involved in politics. I think that there has to be a certain level of corruption that you have to have to reach the levels of power that Biden has reached, but again, discounting politics and the state of his legal issues, Ifind Biden less contemptible. Cue all the “But he’s a kiddy sniffer” posts in 3-2-1…

Yes. It sounds a lot more sciencey than “Men just can’t help it”.

The majority of the Geek Bored thinks vaginas have teeth.

One in four married couples are childless by choice. You think all of those couples have two working people? I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.

Lots of judgement and projection going on for someone who was honest enough to state what she wanted, and despite the certainty of some here that it could never happen unless she was Giselle Bundchen level, there would be plenty of men who would be perfectly fine with the arrangement, especially if they are the type that doesn't know how to/want to cook, clean, do laundry, etc. There are plenty of guys out there that don't want kids and want someone to take care of their needs exclusively. If someone is capable and wants to do that for them, more power to both of them. Also, is this really the way that normal, non-wealthy people approach marriage? Worrying about what the other person might take that they don't deserve if they get divorced? Sad state of affairs.

That's Geek Bored level logic and understanding for sure!

Yeah, despite the 88 page thread about how they're destined to fail, I would consider them a good bet to succeed.

I can't believe this hasn't been posted yet. You boys need to step up your game.

Trials drag on past election, Trump loses, is convicted, DOESN’T go to jail, no political violence, next president doesn’t pardon him.

Here's a bonus link: 500-600 scientific papers across all disciplines are retracted every year out of 1.8 million published, mostly due to malfeasance. 190 Covid-19 papers have been retracted in two years. Lots of BS on ivermectin, masks, hydroxychloroquine, vaccine non-safety out there by charlatans like Pierre Kory. ETA Let me correct that: 359 papers retracted in two years and 18 that had levels of "concern" expressed. That's an overwhelming number retracted on one subject.

Pierre Kory, a Wisconsin physician and one of ivermectin's most vociferous promoters, testified at Johnson's hearing that if people took the drug they would not get sick. Eight months later, despite taking ivermectin weekly, Kory came down with COVID. This one was about a treatment protocol that didn't work as he advertised, and he also had one on ivermectin removed from another journal Jumping to the conclusion that excess deaths in any age bracket according to actuarial tables is the result of Covid vaccines is a Robert Kennedy level conclusion. You simply cannot factor in the amount of variables that could contribute to this number and come to that conclusion.

Democrats don't care about Hunter.

There's an approximately zero chance that Trump will not be a dominant force in this election cycle whether he's the nominee or not.

I think you won't get a lot of Democrats supporting a candidate that pledges to pardon Trump. That's a hard, hard sell.

It never really happened with drobs, either. Sorry.

Nobody serious is going to run against a sitting President, and I wouldn't expect a Democrat to have policies you agree with. Tim Scott is a better candidate than Vivek.

Sherrod Brown has been an effective Senator from Ohio for a long time. He would make a fine President if he ever decided to run.

Is my posting style like drobeski's?

He also has had at least one paper retracted, insisted he wouldn't get sick with Covid because he took Ivermectin (then got sick), and generally is the worst type of scientist there is.

Come on, I haven't said Biden is good, bad, or anything. I'm not comparing the two. I only know what's on his website. His ideas on government bureaucracy (eliminating departments and agencies, moving employees out of Washington, etc) are simply not workable in any legitimate timeframe and will cause way more chaos than everybody thinks. How are taxes going to be collected if you eliminate the IRS? I mean, nobody like taxes or the IRS, but what do you replace it with? Not to mention eliminating Social Security? Ban social media for kids? these ideas appeal to the GOP base but have literally no chance of being enacted if by some miracle he's elected President. It's all pie in the sky and learning on the job shouldn't be what we desire in a President.

Endlessly complaining? I have less than 100 posts, man!