Maximum Overkill

No stupid, I want them to pay their share of taxes just like everyone else does. No handouts, no freebies. Is that too much to ask?

Ohhh, no charges filed, no police report? I have videos of Biden molesting kids.

Senior man found on fire at Penn Station, hospitalized with severe burns: cops https://www.amny.com/news/senior-man-fire-penn-station-12272024/

Provide the Police report

Please provide the Police report, otherwise shut the F up.

It's fair to question but Jay Z isn't exactly a great person. Drug Dealing: Jay-Z has openly discussed selling crack cocaine in the late 1980s. He has referred to this period in his lyrics and interviews, describing how he turned to the drug trade to escape poverty. Robbery: He has also mentioned being involved in robberies during his teenage years, although specific details about these incidents are less frequently discussed.

Peenie finds it hard to believe that his Rap Hero who sings about Biatches and HOs could possibly do such a thing.

Except the judge sees enough evidence to proceed with the case. It's not a nothing burger.

https://twitter.com/TheKevinDalton/status/1872799430338068490

Rachel Maddow told him so

SteveGrab, Big john , Shaft, DMD, Darin3, Purple monster, Bobby Brown The place is a Joke, a liberal suckfest

Stop, Drop and Roll Biatch! Now kindly step aside, I have a train to catch.

Says the lonely Pedocrat who's still posting while everyone else is sleeping or spending time with their family

Is that where you go to pick up 12 year olds? Why do you care?

So you think the girl who claims Jay-Z raped her at 13 is lying? Defending Pedophilia, get over it Jay-Z’s Dismissal Attempt Fails in Rape Lawsuit A federal judge has denied Jay-Z’s motion to dismiss a lawsuit accusing him and Sean “Diddy” Combs of raping a 13-year-old girl at a party in 2000. The lawsuit, filed by a woman identified as Jane Doe, alleges the assault took place after an MTV Video Music Awards after-party. Both Jay-Z and Combs have denied the allegations, calling them baseless and defamatory. Why the Judge Ruled Against Jay-Z Judge Analisa Torres ruled that the case should proceed, emphasizing the accuser’s right to be heard. She also allowed Jane Doe to remain anonymous, citing concerns about her mental health and potential harassment if her identity were revealed. The judge criticized Jay-Z’s legal team for using aggressive tactics, calling their approach unnecessary and counterproductive. The Allegations Jane Doe alleges she was drugged and sexually assaulted by Jay-Z and Combs at the after-party. According to her, she has no memory of the events after consuming two drinks distributed by waitstaff. She later woke up in a hospital with torn clothing and no recollection of how she got there. The lawsuit also claims she received threats from an unknown woman discouraging her from pursuing legal action.

And go to jail for life in NY? No thanks

AKA Bobby Brown in other Forums

They're crafty little Pedros

That's the same thing as banning someone. Both are for Pvssies. Imagine a Man "ignoring" another Man because he's triggered, that's ghey

Sometimes. Make sure you play the Lottery tonight BOYO

They're ok, nothing special. You'll get way better cuts from your local butcher.

Smart ones, mailbox money. You?

Maintain my investments

Another Lazy shiftless Liberal

Fake News