jonnyutah
Members-
Content Count
2,131 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Everything posted by jonnyutah
-
This is great information. I mean its the letter of the law right? That is what I always hear when they lock up granny praying to stop babies from being killed.
-
MLB - 16 single-game feats we may never see again!
jonnyutah replied to edjr's topic in The Geek Club
Spahn and juan combined for over 31 innings in one game. -
MLB - 16 single-game feats we may never see again!
jonnyutah replied to edjr's topic in The Geek Club
Cant watch a video right now, but looking forward to it. Is Spahn/marichal game in there? -
Yes! Finally somebody gets it. Once all of you have been punished for your past bs and you all learn we are capable of turning on you, we can return to our regularly scheduled programming. I hope pretty soon we will have a plan for how to cancel these activist judges. And then we can have peace.
-
Lol. Your team does both.
-
Trump should fire brendan carr. Then liberals will support Carr and we walk away from this mess unscathed.
-
This has to feel pretty good for sinclair after what biden did to them before.
-
Has to be at least 18.
-
Shooter was a registered democrat when he was 18.
-
Is he married to connie chung?
-
.5 out of 10
-
Brian Kilmeade on Fox endorses euthanizing homeless and mentally ill people with "Involuntary lethal injection"
jonnyutah replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
Seems like liberals should start a campaign. Get this guy fired. Reach out. Write letters. Call. Threaten to boycott, again. -
Mahmoud Khalil Thread - Immigration judge orders Khalil deported to Algeria or Syria
jonnyutah replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
Good riddance. -
Anna Gomez out there proving why Carr is still 1000 times better.
-
Brendan Carr should have kept his trap shut. Kimmel was going to get canceled. Now he has turned him into a hero. What a dummy.
-
Trump designating Antifa as Terrorist Organization
jonnyutah replied to lickin_starfish's topic in The Geek Club
I'm all in. Ron with his first good idea. -
If liberal politics causes more crime, then explain this:
jonnyutah replied to The Real timschochet's topic in The Geek Club
"no youre wrong. Lalalala. I wont share my views or really anything of consequence, I just like to type. And you are wrong too." -tim -
You are getting hauck tuah'd.
-
This is why people need to speak up when Biden fast tracks licenses for his team and lets them lapse for his enemies. This is why the media needs to scream when democrats do things. I think this is a bridge too far, but I certainly understand how we got here so easily. Democrats paved this road. Just like they paved the title IX/funding road. Just like they paved so many other roads that trump gets to just waltz down.
-
If liberal politics causes more crime, then explain this:
jonnyutah replied to The Real timschochet's topic in The Geek Club
He is actually crushing your argument. Increasing the social safety net only works of you can control the size of the net. In the US that net would swell so fast it would be unsustainable. The government would always need more money. In Denmark they know exactly how big their net will be. -
His mama called him appointedbywalz. Ima call him appointed by walz.
-
I am not cool with what brendan carr said. I would be totally fine with dropping the hammer on CNN, MSNBC, etc. But late night comedy shows? Gtfo.
-
Broad generalizations are a problem when they are grossly inaccurate. "Blacks love taffy" is obviously a made up nonsense statement. "Blacks vote democrat" isnt 100% true every time, but pointing out it isnt true 100% of the time makes you a moron.
-
Some truth to that for sure.
-
A logical person making an argument based on A would then abandon that argument once A is proven false. But for liberals, A wasnt really important anyway. They simply start with priors and then try and make the pieces fit. That is why when A is proven false they get mad and make excuses. Another move in the liberal playbook is to look at somebody's argument based on ABCD and then nitpick at A using less then cedible means. Then pretend A is false and use that to defeat the whole argument.
