jonnyutah

They told us there would be no more elections. I was hoping for that. No more campaign commercials, stupid signs, cutting in during golf tournaments because some old hair sniffer dropped out of the race.

Comedian tells a joke about puerto ricans. Fema supervisor tells workers to skip trump voters houses. One of those was a big story for MSNBC, CNN, etc.

Omg you called them boys in girls sports! You hysterical transphobic nazi!

This thread is great.

We talking canadians or canadians here?

Black women vote 90/10 every election. They think this makes them heroes. Not mindless idiots that do the same thing every time.

Telling people the economy was great is one of the bigger campaign blunders of recent times. Gdp growth is super useless when the backbone of that growth is increased pricing and government spending. Jobs numbers fully juiced by the immigrants you brought in isnt a great look either.

My god. Such a disconnect. Omg how could latino people vote for Trump? They cant fathom that maybe, just maybe, the people streaming across the border suck so bad that latino voters would be like hey, we dont want this. Instead they view all latinos exactly the same.

Kinda wild how Democrats just assume all third party votes were rightfully theirs.

Wisconsin taking forever. Like 1% getting counted every hour.

Seeing all the comparisons to 2020 and it really shows how in the tank for democrats the media is. They knew the hispanic vote was turning hard for trump. That is why they tried to make such a big deal about a joke made by a comedian.

CNN coverage has been great. They just said this is a shellacking.

Thank you. I started this by saying liberals are stupid af. You have helped me prove it.

But medhi turned it into "i should die, you are saying, I should die"

Liberals are dumb af. He said i hope it doesnt go off. He said i hope you dont die.

The npr headline takes your argument and wipes its butt with it. This fake division of "well thats the editorial board" becomes a distinction without difference once it gets lobbed to the next receiver. "Washington Post' won't endorse in White House race for first time since 1980s"

Kelly, lol. Dude has gone on record, but is unwilling to go on record here? I thought you were big on encyclopedia brown investigating? The family's lawyer calls goldberg a liar and you are all like well, the lawyer didnt say exactly what he was lying about. Lol. This is the part you fail to understand. Goldberg outed himself as a POS dishonest hack the moment he published a story based on anonymous second hand stories. I dont have to weigh in on anything else. He already did it. We dont allow those things to have weight in our society because they are unfalsifiable and have no place. That is the whole point. That is why a court would never allow it. That is why a teacher would never allow it. That is why a parent would never allow it. Only partisan hacks give it weight. You give it weight. If A then B. A. B. Twatwaffle.

Probably a Haitian thing.

If there was research showing evidence of sterilization, would it get published?

Of course it is. Its impossible to prove somebody didnt say something. When making such ridiculous claims about something somebody said, you have to at the very least offer a he said, she said to not be a hoax. The suckers and losers story didnt even provide that. It was an unnamed he said/he said/he said. That's save ferris level nonsense.

No. The suckers and losers story is a hoax because it has never been verified as true and Jeff Goldberg is the only known source. From snopes: In sum, the claim stemmed from a story by The Atlantic, awhich relied on anonymous, second-hand reports of Trump's alleged words; there was no independent footage or documented proof to substantiate the in-question comments; and Trump vehemently denies that he once called service members "losers" and "suckers." While it was certainly possible that he said those things, Snopes was unable to independently verify the claim.

Watergate source being anonymous followed generally accepted journalistic principles for using such a source. Obviously the results of what went down back all of that up. Did that escape you?

Lol. Explain it to me Captain 70 smooth.

"True Maga" doesnt care what the donald says at this point. They love him. But there is a large group of people that can see an increasingly devious and dishonest media is a horrible thing for this country. 25 years ago 60 minutes would have had their entire staff terminated or they would have likely resigned. Jeff Goldberg would have lost his job the last time he pulled this. We are living in a world where journalists now use the Colgate commercial technique as their gold standard. So people like "trail guy" impune every source that denies the story, but rely heavily on a source that he can't even provide a name for, and then aggressively tries to deflect from that. That's low IQ stuff. You might as well say nut uh and na na na boo boo. Same level.

We call that deflection. The reality here is you have no clue. You cant provide a name.