jonnyutah

Also if she stored her pet unicorn in the garage.

Stayed with her niece once. All requirements satisfied! You guys are a riot today.

Yes. You missed it.

Husband- "hear me out, lets buy a second home in Norfolk" Wife- "Oh, yes, lets go look on the coast, it is beautiful in the fall" Husband- "Ummm...I mean at Lafayette and Perrone" Wife- "die"

"hey honey, lets look for an airbnb in the ghetto for this weekend" Said nobody ever.

Lol. Dude. Look where the house is. You think she was ever planning on living there at all? As far as the airbnb talk thats all ridiculous too. There isnt a single airbnb in the vicinity of this place. They are all on the coast.

Did your friends all lie and say it was primarily for their use as a second home?

What if it was for the first year?

Lol. You guys are hilarious.

Yes

The only careful wording here is you. I mean come on. You are saying the indictment didnt say it, the idictment says she filed tax forms that say it. Lol. Where else would she have indicated personal use days? This is just typical lloyd christmas nonsense.

That isnt the issue here. The rates are higher on investment properties compared to second homes.

Hahahahaha. Tim the lying fake jew weighs in. Tell us tim the lying fake jew, what did you hear on talk radio today? I mean what are you going to lie and say you heard on talk radio today?

Fannie mae generally regards long term rentals as 12 months.

The one year term was breached according to the indictment, as it stated she has declared zero personal days of use for tax purposes. It does prohibit long term rental, as you cant have a long term rental that is primarily for personal use.

If you have a signed second home rider it is literally an agreement that you will not rent out the house. In exchange for agreeing to this, you get a better mortgage rate. According to the indictment, she signed a second home rider.

Not if you have a signed second home rider for the lower rate.

Why do you keep bringing this up? Who cares? If she bought a house she claimed was going to be a second residence and then used it as a rental in 2020, she is guilty.

Then you wouldnt be asking about events in 2023 when the indictment is for events in 2020.

You really should read the indictment.

"Ohhhhh that analysis! I knew about that for sure when I made my super strong statements. Also let me now reject that." -ron

Of course I agree. We should cut every penny we can to states that provide anything to illegals.

Yes. That indictment is crystal clear. You read it correctly.

Do you ever bother to read any exchange of posts you’re not directly involved in? Hahahahaha. You just did this a couple days ago. You thought you had a gotcha and thought I was talking about democrats using the nuclear option right now, without a majority, rather than when democrats held the advantage and didnt make them permanent.

"I will once again form a very strong opinion on something that I know nothing about" -Ron