Jump to content

Niner49er

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    255

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Niner49er

  2. Posted

    still disagree, both were game changing calls that had a huge impact on the outcome of the game

    Still disagree with your earlier comment that Dallas did not deserve to advance. You have given no reasoning aside from the fact they were deflated afterwards even though they had a lot of other chances. Dallas was not in position to have such chances after the bad call.

  4. Posted

    i disagree, if that interference call stands, they come away with another td or fg and the momentum of the game is way different moving forward than what happened after the refs focked the lions over

    I disagree- after the incomplete pass ruling on 3rd and 1, it was 4th and 1 which DET lined up to go for it, but got called for delay of game. So they ended up punting. Bad coaching, there was still 8 mins left in the game, AND DET was still leading in the game.

    There was plenty of time DET still had to do something, but they couldn't do shiat against Dallas in the second half.

  5. Posted

    agree, the cowboys shouldn't even have been there today

    Dallas absolutely deserved to be there today.

     

    That being said - that one play isn't the reason Detroit lost. They held leads of 14-0 and 20-7 (20-7 with 5 mins left in the 3rd quarter). They failed to make critical stops on several 3rd and longs and two 4th down attempts. They scored all of 3 points in the entire 2nd half. On the "call" in question, it was a 3rd and 1 - the Lions opt to throw a 25 yard pass play, seriously?? And nobody kept the Lions from going for it on the next play of 4th and 1

  6. Posted

    Even if Dallas had scored there, how likely do you think it would have been that they could have stopped a green bay field goal?

    I think green bay would have won either way. Remember that green bay took a knee within field goal range.

    It's true, something should be done about how horrible the officiating is... Dallas had plenty of opportunities to win the game but it doesn't change what a horrible call that was. Dallas from the 1 yard line punches that in baring a miracle stop by GB. It would have been fun to see GB have to drive with 2 minutes left but alas the refs ruin another game. It gets old seeing the refs change the outcome of games.

  8. Posted

    The same rule was used on the bull**** Cobb "catch" earlier. Apparently, a clear angle of the ball nosing in to the ground is "disputable" as to whether he made the catch. However, a clear shot of Dez planting his foot and extending his arms to the end zone is indisputably not making a football move.

     

    My problem is the review. They call that not a catch on the field, I'd be disappointed, but I can sure as hell understand. I'd say "I think that was a catch, but I can see someone arguing that it wasn't." I've done it before on A&M calls, Dallas, calls, and teams I don't give a rat's a** about. Then sthere are some calls I have no idea what the hell the replay refs think "indisputable" means. The Bryant no-catch, the Cobb "catch," the Fail Mary, a Manziel touchdown where the back end of the ball is all the way across the plane with his hand clearly gripping it.

     

    I can understand bang-bang, missed calls. The ones that get me are the replay officials making bull**** calls, when there is either indisputable evidence it needed to be overturned and they don't (Cobb's catch, Fail Mary, Manziel's fumble for example), or disputable evidence that they use to overturn a call (Bryant's catch).

×