MudDawgs4Life

yes, caddy update please. assuming caddy starts, pittman still might not be a bad start this week against the 49ers. i have the tandem and might start pittman over antoine smith. any thoughts on that?

doesn't sound like a big trade to me.

i feel barber won that job (not from JJ, but while JJ is out) during the 4th quarter of the Giants game. he was in every play and getting the ball. then, the following week, he gets the start, 22 carries and 95 yards. i think the writing is on the wall - if JJ can't go, Barber is the starter. i might start him against arizona as my flex over antoine smith, any thoughts on that?

the Jets are the worst football team in the NFL. last night's performance solidified it. They couldn't even snap the ball. zero protection, it's a miracle they scored 14 points. i really thought every one of their possessions was going to end with a turnover. and yes, i lost my matchup this week because of the atlanta defensive touchdown.

which backup is worth picking up if Davis can't go?

maybe now burleson will step up and show he's worth the contract and try to get a fat payday after the season, stick it to the vikings. well, at least that's what's best for my fantasy team.

are you hoping for 12 dunn fumbles? i would watch prison break if I were you, because I think you lost that one buddy. Fumbles are not minus points in my league well then I'll say it again, you already lost. hence, you have no double-header, right? or did you make a typo there.

are you hoping for 12 dunn fumbles? i would watch prison break if I were you, because I think you lost that one buddy.

My league is having a debate, people want to be able to trade if games for that weekend have already taken place. For example, this week, a trade on Saturday or Sunday morning would have been fine as long no players who have already gone are involved. Or even a trade at 3:55pm on Sunday that would trade players involved in 4:00pm EST games, Sunday Night games, Monday Night games or bye weeks - again, as long as the players involved haven't played. I know this isn't standard, but can you think of reasons that these trades shouldn't be allowed?

The Colts are 7-0, what are the chances that come week 16, they've got home field in the playoffs wrapped up and the Colts pull a Philadelphia Eagles circa 2004 and bench their studs to keep them healthy? It definitely could happen and ruin team's fantasy championships across the country. Last year, McNabb focked me in this situation. If they're still undefeated (unlikely), they'll probably all play for history, but if not...

i'm in 3 leagues, and the super bowl is in week 16 in all of them. i think that's pretty much industry standard really. week 16 still didn't stop the Eagles last year and it might not stop Indy this year either.

rhodes will probably be benched after a quarter too. pick up ran carthon.

hahahahaha, worse play ever. you would have thought they learned their lesson after the jackson fumble, but now, they run that stupid sh%t again. i guess that's what you sign up for when you draft Rams.

Do you want to take this private dance to the champagne room?

why do people start threads about themselves? nobody give a flying fock about your running backs, what do you want us to do? bow down? go away.

wow, draft running backs early. i never thought of that. this is amazing fantasy insight, running backs are important. that's nuts. if only i had known this is august. i can't believe you let this secret out of the bag, you should write a book about it.

Up 12.5 against the Atlanta D. I need them to not score a TD and give up a few TDs and I should be OK. Yeah, I'm pretty much done.