Ron_Artest

Go see him, it will help. Convince him to start seeing a therapist and getting help, it doesn't make him weak to get help. Remind him of all that he has to live for.

Well the White House has acknowledged the report so it's not false, they just said the analysis is wrong, leaked by a low level loser, because everyone knows what happens when you drop 30k bombs on a target, total obliteration. So it appears we're going to ignore the intel and pretend it worked, just like we ignored the intel which led to the bombing.

You can read the article I posted.

Not entirely true, but at least not a total lie per your usual. It was just regarding Schumer. https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/21/politics/republicans-democrats-iran-strikes-briefings

So you're going on record to say that CNN is lying about this?

I don't support our actions against Iran in 2025, so no, you won't find it. That doesn't mean I'm rooting against our country. If we actually did destroy the Iran nuclear program and got a ceasefire with no further US action, I would 100% applaud Trump on his actions. But it didn't happen, so no there has been nothing positive about what he has done so far. Also Iran did not reneg. That would be another lie on top of all the other lies.

First, reporting the truth is not rooting against our country and its military actions. Is it more patriotic to repeat the lie that the nuclear program is totally dismantled? I ask what now because we have already claimed mission accomplished and said we have a forever cease fire. Yet we know both aren't true. Do we admit that we were wrong or ignore and let Iran actually complete this nuke? Will be interesting to see how this plays out. But please spare me on the "rooting against our country" BS. I thought you were better than this.

Strike Set Back Iran’s Nuclear Program by Only a Few Months, U.S. Report Says Classified findings indicate that the attack sealed off the entrances to two facilities but did not collapse their underground buildings. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/24/us/politics/iran-nuclear-sites.html

Iran claims to have smuggled almost all of the country’s highly enriched uranium to a secret location before the US launched strikes on its nuclear bases. Three of Tehran’s most critical enrichment facilities, including its underground facility at Fordow, were pummelled by B-2 stealth bombers and a barrage of submarine-launched missiles early on Sunday morning. But officials believe that most of the material at Fordow and Iran’s other facilities had been moved elsewhere before the strikes. Iran has vowed to continue enriching uranium in defiance of Donald Trump, raising further concerns over its nuclear programme. Takht Ravanchi, Iran’s deputy foreign minister, rejected claims that Tehran would abandon its nuclear programme, telling the Germany broadcaster ARD: “No one can tell us what we should and should not do.” https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2025/06/23/iranians-moved-enriched-uranium-before-us-strikes/ Alrighty then!

The US military strikes on three of Iran’s nuclear facilities last weekend did not destroy the core components of the country’s nuclear program and likely only set it back by months, according to an early US intelligence assessment that was described by three people briefed on it. The assessment, which has not been previously reported, was produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon’s intelligence arm. It is based on a battle damage assessment conducted by US Central Command in the aftermath of the US strikes, one of the sources said. The analysis of the damage to the sites and the impact of the strikes on Iran’s nuclear ambitions is ongoing, and could change as more intelligence becomes available. But the early findings are at odds with President Donald Trump’s repeated claims that the strikes “completely and totally obliterated” Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth also said on Sunday that Iran’s nuclear ambitions “have been obliterated.” Two of the people familiar with the assessment said Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium was not destroyed. One of the people said the centrifuges are largely “intact.” https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/24/politics/intel-assessment-us-strikes-iran-nuclear-sites So what now?

Yes, wanting people to live is generally a sign of a decent human.

garbage person

I was laughing at Donald being humiliated, as I just said. Stop lying, warmongerer.

lie. A NBC News Decision Desk Poll released June 15, conducted along with SurveyMonkey, found that 45% of Americans approve of the way Trump is handling his job as president, while 55% disapprove. Those figures remain unchanged from an NBC News survey in April. (The survey was conducted among 19,410 adults nationwide between May 30 and June 10. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.1 percentage points.) According to the survey, 51% of Americans approve of Trump’s handling of border security and immigration, while 49% disapprove, the exception to his negative overall rating. The NBC News poll, which was conducted from May 30 to June 10, shows a slight majority of U.S. adults approving of how Trump is handling “border security and immigration.” That same poll, conducted as the situation in Los Angeles deteriorated and Trump federalized the National Guard, shows Trump’s net approval on immigration shrinking to plus-4 (49 percent to 45 percent). A recent Quinnipiac poll, also conducted as the protests in Los Angeles began in earnest, shows Trump’s approval on immigration actually underwater, with just 43 percent of registered voters approving, versus a majority (54 percent) disapproving.

No, I do not want the Iranian people to die. I actually am a decent human being. Don't try and pull me down to your level of trash. Admitting that you're trash doesn't make you any better than trash.

The laughing face means I'm laughing at Donald Trump for saying there is a cease fire when there was no cease fire. You're the guy hoping for more bombing. JFC.

How much money did Biden give to Iran and why?

She put out a clarification... The Trump administration has since attempted to recast Gabbard’s comments before Congress, because, after she said Iran was “not building a nuclear weapon,” she had added: “Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile is at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons.”

Following Trump’s attacks on Iran, an admin official tells Rolling Stone, “The intelligence assessments have not really changed” https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-iran-attack-no-intel-nuclear-1235369641/ Just months ago, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified to Congress, in her opening statement, that the U.S. intel community “continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon” and had not reauthorized its nuclear weapons program. “There is no intel,” says one of the officials, who were granted anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. “Nothing new, that I’m aware of… The president is protecting the United States and our interests, [but] the intelligence assessments have not really changed from what they were before.”

How many more dead Iranians were you hoping for?

We have the different judges and the appeals process to protect against any "rogue" or "activist" judges. They check and balance each other. And the judicial system checks the other two branches. Maybe read a book on the constitution so we don't have to read your ignorant posts.

At least Trump TACO'ed on the regime change he called for on Sunday. He went from calling for regime change, to watching our bases get bombed, to a ceasefire and saying God Bless Iran in 24 hours

Actually it is, by definition

Yeah we need to remove the system of checks and balances we have in America. Good take.