Ron_Artest

What a cuck. He was caught on a hot mic saying that he thinks Putin will agree to a deal for him.

I didn't know, so I asked him. Thats gold? What is wrong with you?

You pointed out an example where bro got caught. That's what is supposed to happen. So weak.

So by commenting WINNING with multiple dancing bananas, that means you don't give a sh1t about it? You're a very bad liar.

2 strike self owns in 1 night. Love it

No. This is what he should be doing, not the other stuff that everyone hates that is reflected is his low approval ratings.

Love how strike cherry picks his polls like a fanboy

Now do statistically significant

Look at the thread title bruh.

Cool thanks.

@TimHauck got any receipts?

Yes it's possible, likely even. I'm man enough to admit it. Shame you're not.

Exactly. Strike with the hilarious self own

Well we can start with the title of the thread. Midterms. So that is what we're talking about. It's also a fair assumption given Trump's history of claiming he lost the 2020 election due to fraud from mail in ballots. It would be foolish to think that Trump cares about and/or questions the integrity of local town council elections.

No you're confused. It's pretty clear what I meant to anyone being fair.

Fair to say that reporting was wrong, or trump changed his mind, or it was offered but we don't know about it. Odds are bad reporting.

If Trump could broker a peace deal both sides would accept, I would be happy. You're always with the BS.

Ok I get it, you're confused. When I said it doesn't exist, I was referring to the statistical significance, not any voter fraud. I agree there has been voter fraud, obviously, but it's not significant and certainly has not influenced the outcomes of national elections. Would you agree with that?

Ok, if I'm wrong I accept that, but you need to prove it. Show me the stats that show that mail in ballots make elections fraudulent.

Try and stick to the topic of the thread, no moving goal posts. Do you agree with Trump that mail in voting makes all elections fraudulent?

Let me explain. If something happens .001%, that means it exists, but not in a frequency where it's significant. Make sense? So while voter fraud has happened in isolated incidents over many years, it's usually not significant to the outcome of the election. When Donald Trump says that we need to stop mail in ballots because you can't have a free election with it, the next question is show me the evidence in a statistically significant manner. You can't. And that's where we are. Hope this helps.

I'm guessing you never took a stat class in your life. When looked at this at a national level, how many districts does this happen?

The thread is about how mail in voting makes an election fraudulent. You can either provide evidence that it does. Or the other statement was that the fraud is stastiscally significant. You can Providence that shows it is. One story about a primary doesn't do that, I'm sorry. So again you can try harder or just yawn.

The statement was made that statistically voter fraud is non existent. You presenting one example proves that point. What were talking about is the need to eliminate mail in ballots because you can't have a free and fair election with it. That's complete BS. I invite you to counter that if you like but a single story of Michigan city council member ain't gonna cut it. You'd be wise to just sit this one out.

And yet he's 100x the man Donald will ever be