Ron_Artest

It happened during covid, which of course you're going to say is rigged because it was for Biden. You just repeat Trump's lies like a a ventriloquist dummy

It's the same point you tried to make by saying what if she was only off by 15% and you think that proved your point. But you're terrible at logic and you're not smart so I one-uped you

In my opinion, today’s Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114955222046259464

So then she wasn't fired for being 70% off. Thanks for proving my point.

If she revised the job number 70% up would she have been fired?

No it wasn't. Trump said it wasn't. You're disagreeing with Trump?

If the 15 Pct revisions were to low numbers, yes. If she only revised down 15 Pct to the high numbers, no. He fired her because he didn't like the low numbers. He's gonna fake high numbers.

How do you know what my kids sound like? You don't know sh1t about my kids, you just wish for horrific things to happen to them. My son is a registered Republican and one of my daughters was talking about voting for Trump in 2023 until I enlightened her. Don't talk about my kids.

puzzy. What about you? If she put out terrible.job numbers all along would he just accept them? Or you think he'll do anything to make himself look better?

I'm not going to pretend to assume what goes on in the cesspool of Trump's brain but I would say the bls numbers for May and June were initially low that he would cry about it. He never said she was fired because her numbers were off 70%, he said she lied, rigged, faked. He wants good job numbers and if he can't get there via his policies he will just rog the numbers. Either way bls is going to report higher job growth regardless of the reality if he gets his way.

It's been almost a month since you posted that and he not only hasn't shed light on this, he's further obfuscated the situation by simultaneously lying about it and also admitting that victims were stolen from him and he has moved Maxwell to club fed indicating that she helped him out. Are you man enough to admit that this stinks now?

She wasn't fired to incompetence. She was fired because she allegedly rigged the numbers. That malice. Are you disagreeing with Father?

Some more data if you're truly interested in this topic: https://archive.ph/pFTjs Bloomberg article discussing how the doge cuts have limited the amount of data collected and how the data is collected. This is related to CPI and the conclusion is that inflation is probably higher than the govt understands. This can also apply to jobs, as we see the large downward revisions. Less people collecting and analyzing data, less accurate data. Another article highlighting that the revisions indicate that we didnt understand just how bad the economy is. They use 2008 as an example. Big Downward Jobs Revisions Could Be a Warning Sign for the Economy - The New York Times https://share.google/TRlHwAlfmc8u1IWKU Firing the head of the bls is not going to make this better. All it will do is direct the new head of the bls to present fake data to make trump happy. Regardless you can't just take the data. Real people looking for jobs and paying more for goods have voices.

Yes I am. You consider helping your kids pay for their education as being "run" by your kids? Thats pretty messed up man. What about providing them clothes, food and shelter. Is that a cuck move for a parent? What happened to you?

You mean Republican right?

So when Biden was president, the downward revisions were because they were trying to make the biden numbers look better. But with Trump the downwards revisions are to make trump look bad. Imagine being that brainwashed.

Yes.

🥷

We're talking about how my kids have student loans. If my kids "ran" me wouldn't I have just given them the money? You're an idiot.

It's not fake you idiot.

Do you even know how this works? It's a series of surveys of businesses that report hiring or firings. They make assumptions off the first survey, then refine twice more as they get more data. Again she wasn't fired for being 70% off on the revision. She was fired because he said that was fake. How abnormal are the revisions in this month’s jobs report? | MPR News https://share.google/hlfVAxm6MlrsTTAI2

That not why she was fired. She was fired because he said her numbers were rigged. He said she gave fake numbers.

So you're good with him firing people who don't lie for him?

So weak.