dmac37

I almost sat Romo for Hasselbeck and Glenn for Dillon at flex, but came to my senses and played both. This may keep me alive for the playoffs. Also as a Detroiter enjoyed Joey sticking it to that sad sack Millen!

I have both Hass and Romo, if Hass has a good report from practice today I think I will roll with him. Problem is if he does not seem to be close to 100% after practicing all week, too late to play Romo!

I would look to add Brown, but a tough call as your RB's all have tough matchups.

What can Brown do for you I would say Berrian but I like both Cotchery and Evans more than most do.

Who do you think has more value from here on out?

I like it, including wins and points is the most fair in the long haul. We used a system in a 12 team league, 2 points for a win also the top 4 scoring teams get another 2 points, the next 4 get 1 point and the bottom 4 get zero.

I just traded for him due to the playoff schedule and I also have Melwelde Moore. I get Taylor & Jennings both good playoff schedules I give Dunn & D. Bennet

TO is getting the looks right now for sure but it could even out more. Romo like a lot of young QB's seem to key on 1 or 2 guys, that could change as he settles in and TO will see more double teams. TO is the #1 and Glenn #2 but it could become closer than it has been the last few games, and don't forget TO is bound to go off the deep end and it all could change.

Use a victory points system. Example: 12 team league you get 2 points for a win no matter how many points you score. In addition the 4 top scoring teams get 2 points, the next 4 teams in scoring get 1 point and the 4 lowest scoring teams get 0 points. So you could lose to the top scoring team but still get points for scoring high points.

I had picked up Huard but dropped him because of a game time decision. I went with Young on a hunch, I think he stands a good chance for both yards and TD's with the combined threat of running and passing.

Write in ballot. Jones-Drew, he is already scoring well while only getting about 1/3 of the touches. If he gets the full time gig look out!

Rhodes owner here and I think between as stated above about wrong side of RBBC and playing @ Den. I would try Morris by default.

Don't feel great about it but I would go with Johnson.

Week 8 I have Hasselbeck injured and A. Smith @ Chicago. Thinking of playing a one one week hunch Vince Young vs the Texans rated #26 vs run and #30 vs pass. Thinking he can rack up decent numbers combing run and pass this week. Also thinking he runs for a touchdown. Crazy talk or worth a gamble

I would do it, I think both McGahee and Cotchery have great playoff schedules. Watched the Jets game last week and Cotchery looked great.

To me the most fair is decimal scoring, if a player runs for 39 yards he gets 3.9 points and so on. Also in a head to head league award 2 points for the win and example with a 12 team league the top 4 scoring teams get another 2 points win or lose and the next four in scoring get 1 point and the bottom 4 get zero extra. This helps the games when the top 2 scoring teams play each other and the loser gets nothing.

PPR I would look at Jones-Drew, otherwise Washington going north and Lewis heading south.

A cherry on top and then some for me. DJax is 1B with Fitz as my 1A Injured, A. Smith my back up QB is @ Chicago next week, and Portis on a bye.

In our league tonight the commish just traded McGahee for Gore, in his favor but not so bad. Then in another trade (with his brother) commish trades : Morris, Maurice SEA RB Wayne, Reggie IND WR Chargers, San Diego SDC Def for Smith, Steve CAR WR Bears, Chicago CHI Def Am I wrong to question this, both teams are 2-4 but the commishes team is much better than their record 3rd best in points.

Jaguars | Taylor pondering retirement Published Sat Oct 21 10:13:00 a.m. ET 2006 (KFFL) Michael C. Wright, of the Florida Times-Union, reports Jacksonville Jaguars RB Fred Taylor may retire if the team is unwilling to restructure Taylor's incentive-laden contract, which has two years remaining. "It's crossed my mind, the more and more things are taken away from me, like playing time," Taylor said. "You exert so much energy into one cause and it's not reciprocated. It's like putting money into an ATM machine. You keep putting money in, but every time you use your card, it says insufficient funds. At some point, you're going to quit putting money into it." What does this do for the Jax RB's for this year.

Some of my other issues with this are reflecting back when the commish set up the league we were one short and added his brother. At the time no problem and I was glad we had a complete 12 team league. We are run by my fantasy league and you can see owner activity on the site the brothers team had not been active on his team page for over 2 days while and after the trade was made. I see now why people like a no trade league if it is a public league on the net. The league is also set up for league vote on trades and this was not done, it also has not been done for previous trades but they were not lopsided like this so nothing was said. Also the brother owner does not own SA.

It seems like the opinion is that the trade is in his favor but not that bad. Maybe I over reacted because he is the main competion in my division and he has had other trades in his favor (my opinion) but not so lop sided, I had no issues until the last one. Now he has 6 of the top 24 players in a 12 team league and he only drafted 2 of them. To me the last trade made zero sense to the other guy (his brother). If it is on the up and up more power to him.

One website (don't remember the site)I saw in pre season did a study and reported that it turned out better to have a lot of byes in one week and take a hit for the one week to be stronger for all the other weeks. I think it is best to draft without regards to the byes and stick to your best available.

i'd go McMichael. he's been coming on a bit and GB defense is terrible. i can see him getting in the end zone vs them.

Play the % of touches = McGahee