Jump to content

lv_2_hack

Members
  • Content Count

    383
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by lv_2_hack


  1. If you can get Olson I would make the trade. Ball is not going to just simply play back up, at best I see a 50-50 timeshare.

    Nope. Peyton has never had a timeshare at rb. As long as hillman is healthy he will remain the starter and receive 80 percent of the workload. Best case scenario for ball owners is he comes back as the goal line back.


  2. Less attractive? What!?!

     

    Go back and look at what Harry Douglas did when both Roddy and Julio were out last year. Heck look what Tate did last week with Calvin hobbled. More opportunities equals less value?

     

    Sanu's value can't go down. He's a solid #2 right now, will end up being a high #2 or low #1 while Green is out.


  3. Will he continue or will he regress back to normal New Orleans days?

     

    I have been offered Monte Ball for Sproles and Maclin

     

    My Rbs- Lacy, Sproles, Vereen, Rainey, Trich

     

    My Wrs: Julio Jones, Wallace, Maclin, Edelman Gordon

     

    Thoughts?


  4. I'm in a 2 QB league and I'm debating on oicking up Cousins and holding 4 QBs. Cousins,Cutler,Locker and Stafford.

    I'm in a 2 qb league as well with Romo Ryan Tannehill. We have 100 FAAB for waiver wire and then pickups after Thursday morning are free. Thinking of spending a large chunk on cousins.


  5. Romo is not right, and nothing suggests he will be right anytime soon. His mobility and arm strength are gone - and it's blatantly obvious. To make matters even more shaky, he's been sacked 7 times in 2 games. I fully expect him to be carted off the field anytime now.

    Thoughts on cousins?


  6. I have Romo and Tannehill... thought Tannehill would be decent in his new offence, it doesn't look that way. You are right about wondering about Romo, he may become a bus driver. He cant seem to get away from the rush at all, he just falls down. Would you rather have cousins over Tannehill ? or wait to see if Tannehill figures it out ?

    I liked the idea of tannehill at the beginning of the year as well. Also have Wallace in all 3 of my leagues. Having said that Tannehill doesn't seem accurate enough yet.

     

    I think cousins will succeed in this offense. He's a better version of Andy Dalton IMO.


  7. 1. Maclin leads the league in receptions

     

    2. Mike Wallace leads the league in receiving yards.

     

    3. Gio Bernard is number 1 overall pick next year.

     

    4. Shady McCoy AND Jamal Charles finish outside top 10 among running backs.

     

    5. Shane Vereen tops 1600 all purpose yards.


  8. Yeesh....not that rg3 has looked good....but my lord do they have some playmakers on offense, so I'm not sure why everyone thinks this is such a good matchup....especially considering the texans were awful last year.

     

    What am I missing here.....

    This is my concern.

     

    I keep coming back to Houstons D wasn't THAT bad last year. I think they were top 10 in yards allowed, but gave up a large amount of points from some goofy plays (schaub pick 6's and special teams TD's).

     

    After watching them slow down Peyton and give Atlanta fits, I think their D could be really good. As long as the offense can put some points up.

×