So you really dont see QB's as having more value than RB's with this setup and point value? I was concerned with this setup it looks like a good QB can be close to 30 or more points a game, which seems to devalue the other positions. I was thinking two of the top 10 QB's would equal 3 top 12 RB's week in and week out, this would tend to make me want to pick up QB's first.
Do you think this all depends mostly on the draft day run? I am concerned if I go RB/RB in first two rounds I will lose out on an elite QB. Honestly I think with the increased WR positions and the depth there missing out on top 10 WR will not hurt my team. My opinion is that with the increased WR positions it dilutes the value of the top WR's even with the point per reception scoring. Where as the QB and RB positions get so thin so quick and they are consistently worth more points. So I am tempted to go RB/QB/RB/QB or some sequence in the first few rounds.
Does anyone have experience in a league with two QB's? What was the general draft day trend? RB's then QB's then WRs? I dont want to get caught up in a rush at one position, I would rather load up at RB and then QB and take my chances on building depth later on at WR. Would this strategy bite me in the rear?
