blagrange

Problem is, you jumped in the conversation with assumptions, got owned, and now you can't back down because you thought you were being clever and really were just being a moron. It's ok, it's just the Internet, you will get over it.

He is the one who accused me of not leaving the house. I was simply pointing out the irony of saying that when in the span of 8 years he has posted 3700 posts while I have posted 248 in the span of 5. Also, this is Sunday and I think most people are sitting in their house or at the bar watching football so who was the petty one? Is this p00h's second account? Why are you trying to be his knight in shining armor. If you read how everything transpired I am not sure how you came to the conclusion that I am the one who brought up e sitting in front of the computer thing - reading comprehension...

His absence hurt more than I thought. Denver's D sucked today in the nfl since (fantasy wise they did ok)

I think you continually over blowing things, attacking and bringing up religion in your response is what makes you look like an idoit. There is no boogeyman just the 10 threads a week about Tebow sucking that you and a few others start or comment on "religously". I simply offer the alternative point of view and it appears that I am more correct than you at this point, you hate that, so you continue to make up "facts" about me as you continually skirt the issues that you get called out on. As I have stated in the few posts that I have commented , I am a Broncos fan - not a Tebow fan, so I am not sure how religion is relevant in is conversation. I can understand you anger though. When you boldly proclaim things that you have no idea what your saying, and it comes back to bite you, it sucks....

Ok and 2006 here, so double or triple my posts and my response still applies.

Lol, with that response it appears you are the one within unhealthy obsession. hahaha. Let's see, 3400 posts to my 246, who needs to get out more?

This

So haters what do you have to say today? If you are going to say that he can't pass then you are blinded by idiocy.

Are you retarded or is this an attempt at humor? What do you think?

i was impressed that there was a "worst QB" thread without a mention of Tebow. But then I knew someone would have to jump in and say it. how original....

I think the main difference is Orton turned the ball over 9+ times in the first 5 games. Many of those in Broncos territory. Not to mention the numerous 3 and outs eating up minimal clock due to throwing every down. I think the improved running game and Tebow protecting the ball is helping the defense stay rested and keeping the Broncos winning the field position game thus the improved defense.

Then you have not been watching.

yeah, this fun. I like the arm strength comments.

s It was a team effort. With that said Tebows stats have looked like that in his 5 out of 6 wins. Looks like your 99% stat is a little off. Check your facts

You must be seething that Tebow keeps winning.. After all the crap you have talked blindly following Hoge and e other talking heads. Makes me laugh... I love Haters!

Chris Johnson has some good matchups as well.

In PPR Stewart is the number 2 in my opinion.

I am not a Detroit fan, but there were a couple bad calls that kept scoring drives alive against Detroit. I was surprised by that roughing the passer call - which resulted in a first down and a TD I believe. Staffords picks were the reason they lost though.

I hope it is the Chiefs so Bowe becomes a stud again.

I am not arguing that it will work or not, that is your argument. your argument has been changing on a weekly basis mind you. All I have ever said about Tebow is that they need to give him a chance for the rest of the year and it will take at least that long to find out if he can improve. You and p00h argued that you knew he would fail and giving him that time is a waste and we should be starting Orton. That is the problem, your argument is a moving target because Tim keeps winning and you have to find another reason why he will fail. All I have to base my opinion on is fact , the broncos are winning after starting 1-4. Most of your points are conjecture.

I agree with this 100%. Vick also ran a similar offense in ATL for years. He did get injured quite a bit though. I think the difference is that Tebow can take a hit better than Vick.

That is a nice list, and I heard that on the NFL network and ESPN, but I am asking you to draw from your vast NFL defensive scheme knowledge and tell us how you stop that offense. I mean, since you are convinced about this "gimmick offense" that must mean you know how to stop it, right? Otherwise you are just repeating what you have heard just like "Tebow can't win" etc.. You are aware that many experts said the west coast offense would not work back in the day. Right? BTW, Broncos were not running the read option when they played Detroit. They installed it after that game. Also, if you have been watching all the games you would see the read option has been used sparingly since the Raider game. They have lined up in the I formation as well as the spread (other teams use the spread formation as well, like GB)with some option thrown in. Funny, many detractors said the Jets will be a true test, yet after the win they have become mediocre. I guess the Broncos will only be tested when they do happen lose, whomever it may be to.

Using words like nuthugging while pointing out the negatives makes you a hater. Also, why don't you break down for us why and how this offense will not be sustainable? Don't just talk about about it, back up your claim.

The frustration of owning a shanny back is not worth waiting for the stud to emerge. drop all redskin RB's from your roster to reduce your headaches.

Who wins.