jbycho

I can only hope the parents are liberal democrat voters.

You should learn what 'sexist' means before you start throwing that around.

I like funny jokes. HTH.

Right. No more assumptions than necessary. Just pick the simple answer (even though it may not be right). That does not explain everything. And that does not explain things from a generic uneducated point of view on the subject. When talking about spiritual occurrences, or the occult, Occam's razor does not apply. If someone has is overly tired all the time, it's not necessarily because they have been working a lot.

Well, I could just say, he didn't mean it the way you are taking it. Isn't that what the democrats are doing with Biden now? Biden's words are the topic of the thread actually.

You are changing what he said. What would you say, if Trump said something bad about someone? Would you say all the nation should believe he didn't mean what he said?

I don't know about that. I have no clue about Carlson, but there are things that can't be explained by the simplest explanation. Some of the smartest people who ever walked the Earth at one time believed heart and soul that we have a geocentric universe. I have a couple things I experienced that have me still scratching my head. They mean nothing to most others but to me they were real as day. And I don't always doubt my senses.

Ok, I lumped you in with MDC who I think made a statement that demons aren't real. It may sound stupid to some, but I believe in both the duality of life, and I believe in God. That's my thing. I don't push it on people. But on this Earth, we are humans have the duality mindset and if something like light didn't exist, then neither would darkness. If there was no daytime as we call it, there would be no nighttime because "nighttime" would just be status quo. If there was no bad, there could be no good. So the fact that I believe in decent unexplainable goodness, I can only believe there is unexplainable evil. MDC avoided saying he can prove they aren't real. No big deal. I was just saying someone started the assertion that they aren't real. So therefore the proof is on you or someone else who claims it. I never came out and said they are real. I don't doubt it if someone tells it, but I also don't care enough to endorse it if I have no clue what happened. Carlson wasn't trying to convince people of anything that I know of but again, it's all based on things that can't necessarily be proven logically or proven false logically. The accusers are the ones who bear the burden of proof since they are the ones accusing. Not the guy who simply says he experienced something. I'm guessing he doesn't care enough to try to prove it. I probably called you a name after you called someone else a name or whatever. I have proven that calling me names does not affect my points and I'm fine with that.. I always look at things like "live by the sword, die by the sword". And I hold others accountable for the same. Meaning, if calling people names are part of someone's repertoire, don't be mad if someone uses the same technique against those people. If I care about the subject, I will ignore the cut down and stick to the subject. Usually anyway. But cool. "Reset".

It seems no on here has heard of innocent until proven guilty. You all are the one's accusing someone. You have the burden of proof.

Another guy with low IQ who needs pictures in the books he tries to read. Got it.

You have an opinion that he is lying. I didn't read the article but when someone says something happened to them, and you say it didn't, how can you convince someone that you are correct and he is lying. You can get people with the same opinion to support yours but that's the extent of it. I don't even care about this specific topic as it pertains to Carlson, but I'm interested in hearing your factual evidence aliens from another world don't exist. Or the other things people don't believe in. I'm only saying you all are being definitive in your beliefs and you can't prove that even if I can't definitively prove, for instance, that God exists. I can only go with what my self reasoning is. Some people don't believe because they have never experienced or seen. But none of us know the truth of everything. I have my formed opinions based on certain things, but those are my beliefs. If I believed the world was flat, you could prove me wrong. If I believe in God, you can't prove me wrong. You can only say that's not what you believe in. And that's where it ends. Yet you "adults" here have fun hating people for things you don't even know about. Maybe I've done it before too, but that doesn't change the fact of my argument on this topic. I'm not one who simply disbelieves only because I don't know something.

So tell us what you factually know about angels, God, demons, and alien life beyond our planet.

No, I don't take you seriously if you say there are no such things as demons. Because you don't know. When you accuse someone of lying, you have to prove it.

My point is, if you can't disprove it, you can't prove your opinion it in this situation. That is my point. You just have an opinion based on nothing. Thank you for understanding the absurdity of your take.

You are accusing it. Of course you don't have to prove it but if you want people to take you seriously, then you need to know what you are talking about. Because in fact, you don't know. You can not support your opinion on the matter. In court, the he says she says doesn't prove a thing on either side. Never mind. You will never understand logic. You just prefer to believe in what you make up in your head.

It's like that movie Red Dawn. And the conservatives are the Wolverines.

That's pretty good. The video of him sucking on kids' feet was slightly better, but only slightly.

Peefoam going off the rails again. Thinking people are making fun of him again for his being gay. j No one is making fun of your peepee tough guy. Except maybe your exes.

But you can't disprove it. You can only say you don't know. You are ignorant to the topic. What is with you and men's genitals? No one is making fun of you for being gay.

Did he say he was trying to convince you? He shared an experience. You looked at it and say you have first hand knowledge of why he didn't experience what he said he did, so that proof is what I am asking for. In court (and in logic), you have to prove what you are accusing someone of. If someone accuses you of lying, they have to prove it.

At least the guy I saw was showing it off. If it helped and it makes him feel better, I'm all for it. But going online and saying all these unimpressive things to strangers thinking he's impressing these strangers, I don't get the point of doing that. It sounds like a classic case of loneliness and the need to be accepted.

I would love to see your logical proof spelled out on this one. Pretend it's a logic class. Prove that whatever this was doesn't exist. These "demons".

I forget what it was but I googled something I heard about with Harris, and what I put in the search generated attacks on Trump's character. I was thinking, you know, Google is a really sophisticated search and it finds things for me on minimal search input. It's amazing. But when it comes to Trump or Biden or now Harris, it is 95% redirecting when it comes to things positives about Trump, or negatives about the Democrats. It shows either the opposite first, or "fact checkers" comments about the topic right on top.

What is the basis of your knowledge of the situation? The guy said something happened, you don't believe him because of your political leanings, and that is supposed to be some kind of enlightening proof that he's a liar? We all have zero knowledge of whatever it was he was talking about, but yet you laugh at your own projections of what you are making up in your head that happened? I just don't understand taking a made up viewpoint is all. I have seen a couple things in my life that most people would not believe. But whatever. It's not worth telling to most people online because why do I care? If they don't like me, they will try to use it against me. That's what the minds of children do.

This is the song I think of when I think of social distancing. One for all One for all It's all, it's all for one (whoa) Let's start a union, calling every human It's one for all and all for one (whoa) Let's live in unison, calling every citizen It's one for all and all for one We don't want war Can't take no more It's drastic time for sure We need a antidote and a cure 'Cause do you really think Mohammed got a problem with Jehovah We don't want war Imagine if any prophet was alive In current days amongst you and I You think they would view life like you and I do Or would they sit and contemplate on why Do we live this way, act and behave this way We still live in primitive today 'Cause the peace in the destination of war can't be the way, there's no way So people just be a woman, be a man Realise that you can change the world by changing yourself And understand that we're all just the same So when I count to three let's change One for all One for all It's all, it's all for one (whoa)