squistion

This is the Jack Reacher I pictured from the books. Alan Ritchson seems to have grown into the role (maybe he started reading the books too).

SMH.

Which are Jewish people?

Can't say for sure that you are a white supremacist, but you obviously are an anti-semite.

And to make matters worse, that aggressor is Putin. Ronald Reagan is spinning in his grave.

https://x.com/kylegriffin1/status/1898784687260074446 Trump declined to rule out a recession this year during an interview on Fox. https://x.com/NicholasABrown_/status/1898785162453803279 TRUMP: “I hate to predict things like that. There is a period of transition, because what we’re doing is very big. We’re bringing wealth back to America. That’s a big thing, and there are always periods, it takes a little time.”

Because the numbers were exagerrated to make it seem like a genocide or ethnic cleansing.

And none of the MAGA crowd will have any problem with our sending these people to their probable death. I would guess that there will not be one Republcian in Congress who will speak out against Trump over this. SMH. Sad what we are becoming as a country.

https://x.com/ChrisDJackson/status/1898454128877056062 BREAKING: Trump’s golf habit is bleeding taxpayers dry. His weekend golf trips have now cost $18.2 MILLION—all while he plays at his own resorts. In just 7 weeks, he’s golfed 6 weekends straight. Americans struggle, but Trump’s living large—on your dime.

Jack Daniel's CEO Lawson Whiting said Canadians taking American liquor off store shelves was a disproportionate response to Trump's tariffs. "I mean, that's worse than a tariff, because it's literally taking your sales away." Fun Fact: Lawson Whiting is a Republican who supported Donald Trump.

They just can't quit me.

:crickets:

Dude, they didn't say you were a liar, just the figures of "thousands" of white farmers killed was an exagerration.

https://x.com/SenAdamSchiff/status/1898196475621827007 Five things Donald Trump accomplished this week: 1. Promised more tax cuts for billionaires 2. Further abandoned our ally Ukraine 3. Flip-flopped on tariffs and tanked the stock market 4. Completely ignored skyrocketing prices 5. Went golfing Hope this helps, @elonmusk .

https://x.com/ZelenskyyUa/status/1898307787542999432 Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський @ZelenskyyUa Last night, the Russian army struck the center of Dobropillya in the Donetsk region with two ballistic missiles. After our emergency services arrived at the scene, they launched another strike, deliberately targeting the rescuers. This is a vile and inhumane intimidation tactic often used by the Russians. Tragically, at this moment, 11 people are confirmed dead. My condolences to their families and loved ones. More than 30 people were injured, including 5 children. Eight five-story apartment buildings, an administrative facility, and a fire truck were damaged. I thank all the emergency services, police, SES personnel, and medics who, despite the threat of repeated strikes, remain undaunted and are saving people from this terror. To everyone who defends lives while risking their own. Such strikes show that Russia's objectives have not changed. Therefore, it is crucial to continue to do our best to protect lives, strengthen our air defenses, and increase sanctions against Russia. Everything that helps Putin finance the war must collapse.

What industry are you talking about?

Well, in theory the feds could...but the same $$ might not go directly the states, particularly under the Trump Administration, who might not give it to some states, like California (Trump could use withholding the funds as some sort of punishment/blackmail like he threatened to do after the fires, when he was first POTUS and then again with the most recent fires).

Um...why wouldn't liberals believe it, if funding to schools from the DOE has been documented (which I'm sure it has, unless what we have been told is some sort of fiction). So, ending the DOE would logically reduce funding to schools that the DOE provides, no?

So...are you saying that liberals believe that funding would be reduced and what they believe is true?

Well, if the DOE "provides federal funds and programs for schools at all levels" then if it were eliminated how would that not reduce funding?

Yes, there would be less if what I got from a Google search is accurate: The U.S. Department of Education is involved in school funding. It provides federal funds and programs for schools at all levels, from early childhood through postsecondary education. The department also oversees federal student aid and ensures that schools comply with federal laws.

No, but your omission of the authors names in your cut and paste and not providing the link suggests that (perhaps not intentional on your part). I haven't taken James Carville's rants seriously in the last decade (which is probably true of most Democrats and liberals IMO). He hasn't been relevant since the Clinton years.

Not that when there was no link provided and the three authors names were omitted. So explain what you meant by this. I said most people could figure it out, you said that wasn't true. What am I missing? What started this was that I was respondng to what you originally said: "no one would have been able to analyze the article as you." Which is not the same as saying most people could figure it out. "No one" is all inclusive and has a different meaning than "most people"