squistion

Obviously you don't if you are just making up figures you can't verify to make this look 10 time worse than it is.

How about you provide a link to backup your claim?

I would say more like 0.0001%

Probably, HT has never impressed me as being any kind of a humanitarian.

I thought your 8000 cases stat had to be exaggerated. Appears that I was right, it is more like 900. https://kfoxtv.com/news/nation-world/un-study-reveals-transgender-athletes-have-won-nearly-900-medals-in-womens-competitions-united-nations-sports-lgbt-gender-identity-title-ix-athletics UN study reveals transgender athletes have won nearly 900 medals in women's competitions WASHINGTON (TNND) — The U.N. says transgender athletes competing in women's athletic events have won nearly 900 medals over their competitors, according to the results of a study obtained by The National News Desk (TNND). The 20-page document examined “violence against women and girls in sports” and claims more than 600 biologically female athletes have lost at least 890 medals to transgender competitors. These defeats occurred in over 400 competitions in 29 sports, though authors did not specify specific events, levels of competition or time periods. Authors of the U.N. study said the creation of “mixed sex” competitions has disadvantaged biologically female athletes who take on transgender opponents. “Male athletes have specific attributes considered advantageous in certain sports, such as strength and testosterone levels which are higher than the average range for females even before puberty, thereby resulting in the loss of fair opportunity,” the study reads. “To avoid the loss of a fair opportunity, males must not compete in the female categories of sport.” Biologically female athletes, the study reads, are often tested by their sport’s governing bodies to ensure they are not using performance-enhancing drugs, such as testosterone. Biologically male athletes, however, are only subject to “arbitrary and asymmetrical” testosterone requirements, which the study says creates an imbalanced playing field compared to biologically female competitors.

At some point. You people are so unintentionally funny.

No they didn't. Where do you dig up this stuff.

Not true. He was completely exonerated by all the authorities who looked into to the matter. He did not committ a murder, he prevented the murder of legislators still in the Capitol premises with his heroic action.

If he took the bait of the "honey pot" you think the feds set up, then yes he would have been entrapped (according to your Jan 6 defendants logic)

Seriously, what kind of revisionist history caca is this?

Reading is fundamental. Here are my exact words again: "LBJ had a racist past, but he obviously evolved from that"

If you believe that Jeffrey Epstein was entrapped into sex trafficking young girls to his island, you'll believe anything.

A racist would not have been responsible for gettingThe Civil Rights Act passed. LBJ had a racist past, but he obviously evolved from that (it is possible, see Robert Byrd).

So, Jeffrey Epstein was also a victim of entrapment? You can't make this stuff up.

Yeah, and all that New Deal legislation like Social Security, etc. plus The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (that LBJ pushed through) were incredibly evil too.

That was obviously her intent, to lead an angry mob with clubs, tire irons, flag poles among other weapons, into the House Chambers to attack Pelosi, AOC, Mike Pence, etc. What does anyone think the crowd would have done if they had gotten their hands on the legislators? Doubt they were just going to ask for an autograph.

Anyone who saw the video with several people screaming at Babbitt "HE'S GOT A GUN!" (that she ignored) and think that shooting was not justified is ignoring reality.

Jeebus.

So polices by Democrats now are "evil" SMH.

Marshall Law is trending on X/Twitter because the MAGA folks don't know it's actually Martial Law - and they wonder why we're laughing at them. https://x.com/search?q="Marshall Law"&src=trend_click&vertical=trends

There is yet to be one documented case of any child in this country under 18 getting castrated as part of gender affirming care. Not one.

There is no castration of kids being done in this country, jonny, stop repeating that lie.

Yes, however a sex change operation is not under the umbrella for a 16 year old anywhere in this country.

It never was a "total leftist echo chamber" However, after Trump won in 2016 the moderators gave favoritism to conservatives and MAGA folks, because Joe wanted "A place where my Republican friends will feel welcome" - so the mods bent over backwards making Trump related threads (like HT's) "safe spaces" where they would delete posts critical of Trump and suspensions were given out to liberals while conservatives were not penalized for doing the exact same thing.