squistion

Which leftists? Did they self identify or was that just someone's guess?

No they weren't. Plenty of American Flags were shown in the Convention hall, before, during, and after the speeches, but none were burned.

https://x.com/danpfeiffer/status/1827056075679658203 The fact that RFk Jr sold his endorsement to the highest bidder is going to dramatically undermine his ability to convince his supporters to follow him to Trump

The concern expressed here that will only impact Califonians is so touching.

He along with a couple other posters obviously have nothing better to do with their time. Dont get the point of bumping old dormant theads either.

I didn't see it at his 90 minute State Of The Union Address earlier this year and I didn't see again when he addressed the convention on Monday (outside of a few minor gaffes he seemed fine and certainly more lucid than Trump).

Actually, I think perceptive would be the correct term.

If it is not analgous and conflating two entirely different issues, then it is not hypocritical.

I keep saying that while he has always rambled, he is becoming progressivly more incoherent in recent months to the point Fox has stopped covering his rally speeches in their entirety. You would think his supporters here would be concerned but that is not the case. I get the feeling the debate will come off as a complete train wreck for Trump if he can't focus any better than he has lateley.

I don't find that the least bit analogous. Harrassment of people of color by LEOs is not just happening to 10 black folks a year, it is a systemic problem that has been ongoing for decades, while the number of illegal/fraudent voters has always been minimal and minscule.

From the Twitters: The pitch perfect DNC, the enthusiasm, humor, and truth telling is causing massive meltdowns in magaland.

From reports I've seen, he doesn't read much of anything, as he lacks the attention span. According to unnamed sources, when he was POTUS they had to simplify and "dumb down" the daily national security briefings because he lost interest if they were too detailed.

With only 138 illegal voters out of 8 million, it is not a number that should concern anyone and, yes, that by itself is not a big deal. It would have been more surprising if they hadn't found any voter fraud at all.

I don't know where you came up with that from what I posted.

What point are you trying to make?

Instantly iconic photo by NYT at link, of Amara Ajagu watching her great aunt, Vice President Kamala Harris, deliver her acceptance speech from the front row at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on Thursday. https://x.com/JessicaValenti/status/1826960780098486328 This photo, my god (Todd Heisler/The New York Times)

That was not what she meant, if you take her quote in full and in context, as the article notes.

Context is everything as was pointed out in the article.

No, not misty, but the crowd reaction showed the energy, excitement and enthusiam for Harris and her campaign. She looked Presidential last night and there should be a several point bump in most major polls, I would think.

She articulated what she intends to do as POTUS. Check out a transcript of the speech for the details. And clarification on the Pelosi quote: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/3/18/14957708/pelosi-pass-the-bill “We have to pass the bill,” she said, “so that you can find out what is in it — away from the fog of the controversy.” Conservatives — abetted by dozens of political journalists who should have known better — immediately seized on a truncated version of the quote. Pelosi was really expressing her confidence in the underlying merits of the bill, but it became instead a shorthand for the allegedly dodgy process through which Obamacare was passed. But Pelosi never said the bill was enacted in secret or under cover of night, because it wasn’t. She said it was enacted in a fog of controversy. The controversy, naturally enough, focused on the most contentious aspects of the bill rather than on the most broadly popular. Much of it was about misunderstandings or misconceptions — claims that the bill contained death panels or did nothing to restrain health care costs — rather than on the Affordable Care Act’s concrete benefits. Once the bill was in place, Pelosi was saying, people would come to value and appreciate its contents. She was mocked for this relentlessly for years. But everything that’s happening this winter shows she was right all along.

Liberals have never said that. They have pointed to the difficulty of some minority folks and seniors in getting an ID, not that they are incapable of getting one. And no, voting illegally is not fine, but 138 out of 8 million registered voters is miniscule.

Great speech with a great closing.

https://x.com/TeaPainUSA/status/1826822927204913623 BREAKING: Donald Trump

https://x.com/kylegriffin1/status/1826820170758684915 Here's how Vice President Harris ended her acceptance speech: "Let's get out there and let's fight for it. Let's get out there and let's vote for it. And together, let us write the next great chapter in the most extraordinary story ever told. Thank you. God bless you. May God bless the United States of America."

No one was saying it never happened, or wasn't happening, just that the instances of it were miniscule as this thread proves.