squistion

That is funny.

If you are happy that Usaka is in the thread title, then I'm happy for you too.

Usaka? Isn't that in Japan?

No, treating people humanely and without intentionally causing suffering is not elevating the needs of criminals above our own people.

SMH.

No, treating people humanely and without intentional cruelty does not have to be at the expense of ignoring the needs of our own people.You are setting up a false dichotomy.

No, I care about treating them humanely and without intentionally causing suffering, which is not caring about them over our own citizens, because it is the right thing to do.

No, I don't care about the needs of other citizens over our own - this is not a zero sum game. Talk about deflection, as you keep repeating that Straw Man.

Treating people humanely is not deferring to immigrants over out citizens. Please. You're right in that it is a pointless Straw Man argument.

That speaks volumes about what kind of person you are. And if I believed that I would never admit it, even anonomously, on a message board.

I must agree with jonny, fascist dictatorships are consequential, but never in a good way, and this one won't be either.

SMH. As was said about Trump's family separation policy under his first administration: "Cruelty Is the point, The White House's immigration policies are designed to maximize suffering" https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/for-trump-cruelty-is-the-point/

There were several here who kept repeating that false and discredited meme, and when asked to prove it, they couldn't come up with one reputable study to verify their claim.

During his last administration, there were videos of screaming toddlers being pulled from their mother's arms and it was pretty much met with complete indifference by Trump supporters and the MAGA crowd - I expect the same reaction this time around.

His administration policies towards LGBTQ folks during his first term as POTUS speaks otherwise.

That is correct.

Blue Horseshoe hasn't posted since March of 2023, so he must have gone to that great stable in the sky. RIP.

An apt comparison as it was an acquittal by a jury of someone obviously guilty.

Yeah, I also lost with the OJ acquittal, but with the jury system it happens.

There were witnesses who said they didn't feel threatened and didn't need to be protected. He took the law in his own hands and acted as a vigilante and it resulted in a death. I hope the victim's family brings a civil suit against him and that might discourage others in the future from acting as "a hero" in a similar situation.

Also Luigi had a high profile on social media, which seems unusual for someone who commits this sort of crime.

You might, but I don't know any Canadians that feel that way.

SMH

Nope. You have no evidence from anything she or Democrats have said to indicate that.

Doubtful.