squistion

Not in any that I have seen.

Yes, but I am not sure what exactly she could be charged with...what is exact crime here? Non-performance of her duties? Negligence of some sort? Infliction of emotional distress on those who were unable to sign up for FEMA relief? There is probably something they can come up with, but offhand I am not sure what it is.

No matter who runs a federal agency there will always be some rogue employees. This is nothing to get apopletic about.

Has this ever happened before? I don't recall FEMA workers doing this in the past. Don't think any new laws need to be passed from what seems to be an isolated incident.

No they don't and those who did this deserve to lose their jobs immediately.

https://x.com/TomFitton/status/1855077337508770072 GOOD NEWS: Reports are the incoming @RealDonaldTrump administration prepared to declare a national emergency and will use military assets to reverse the Biden invasion through a mass deportation program.

https://x.com/kylegriffin1/status/1855291881258660132 President Biden just announced his 56th round of nominees for federal judicial positions — bringing the number of announced federal judicial nominees to 261.

I think you need to take a break, jon. You predicted right and won the election. You should be celebrating instead of seething with anger about a few unauthorized FEMA workers with their own agenda. Chill for a day or too.

I am not going to get indignant about a rogue government worker acting on their own without authorization. And I didn't defend the person or persons who did this.

It happened but not a FEMA policy or were they officially directed to do this as the thread title suggests. In other words, a non-story.

I think that some individual Fema worker(s) might have gone off the reservation (so to speak) but no way this was an official policy or were they directed to do this.

The thread title suggests this was an official policy of FEMA and workers were told to skip houses with Trump signs - obviously that can't be right.

Most are from Mexico, Central and South America - they used what little resources they had to travel here. Getting the funds to move to a sanctury city and then finding a job would seem a daunting proposition.

If anyone thinks this is true, then I got some ocean front property in Arizona that I would like to sell you.

And he will stand up to Trump and tell him he is wrong with the tariffs? I doubt that.

An interesting and probablyy fun fantasy on your part, but most people here illegally don't have the resources to travel to a sanctuary city and if they do, be able to find work.

Who, in his inner circle, will tell him that he is wrong and try to talk him out of it? Seriously?

https://x.com/C_Silva_Brock/status/1854621648445751619 BREAKING: 43 Rhesus monkeys "escape" from bio-research lab in Yemassee, South Carolina Kamala to Biden: "You were supposed to release those monkeys before the election!!!!”

Well, OK, did you notice they did not give any other statistical information outside of that? And no link provided outside of the tweet. What were the exact mortality numbers of those who are vaccinated and those that weren't? 5 died who were vaccinated and 1 died who wasn't? 50 died who were vaccinated and 10 died who weren't? 500 died who were vaccinated and 100 died who weren't? 5000 died who were vaccinated and 1000 died who weren't? Also was the cause of death the same for all those who were vaccinatted? Was the age and the health of those vaccinated versus those unvaccinated taken into account? Did all those who died die of the same thing? My point is the death ratio doesn't mean that much taken in isolation. We need to be given more information as to how these doctors came to their conclusions.

https://www.boston.com/news/politics/2024/11/08/massachusetts-governor-maura-healey-state-wont-cooperate-mass-deportations/?s_campaign=bcom%3Asocialflow%3Atwitter&utm_campaign=bdc_Twitter Healey says Mass. won’t cooperate with mass deportations Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey said this week that her administration would not cooperate with federal authorities looking to conduct mass deportations of undocumented immigrants once President-elect Donald Trump takes office. Trump has vowed to oversee the “largest deportation effort in American history,” something that would involve rounding up as many as 13 million people nationwide and cost at least an estimated $315 billion, according to the American Immigration Council. When asked about the cost of a deportation operation on that scale recently, Trump said that “there is no price tag.” In an interview on MSNBC Wednesday, Healey was asked whether the Massachusetts State Police would cooperate with the Trump administration if it were to request the agency’s help in deportation efforts. “Absolutely not,” Healey said. The situation “in the courts” is very different in 2024 than it was in 2016, she added. While litigation against the Trump administration is still on the table, Healey said she would support other ways of resistance. This could include using the state’s regulatory authority, her executive powers, and state legislation. “There’s a lot of other ways that people are going to act, and need to act, for the sake of their states and their residents,” Healey said. “Every tool in the toolbox has got to be used to protect our citizens, to protect our residents, and protect our states, and certainly to hold the line on democracy and the rule of law.”

I am sure they will find something. And you can probably add Liz Cheney and Jack Smith to the list too.

No it isn't. That was the main reason he ran again so he can avoid prosecution for his crimes. He will have the justice department end all pending federal cases leaving only the New York and Georgia state cases. Winning the popular vote doesn't excuse and eleminate all criminal conduct before he takes office next year.

Wouldn't surprise me if it did. You already said you want all the ongoing Trump trials ended and the 34 felony convictions dismissed.

I doubt you will still be laughing when he doesn't leave office in January 2029 (or maybe you will be cheering instead).

So you don't want him to have the option to serve 2 more terms. Got it.