squistion

Not always. but it does happen if they can't stay competitive or make bad business decisions.

I doubt this is a good way to win the UAW vote. Perhaps this is the reason he is cancelling interviews.

"Rachel Dolezal please pick up the white courtesy phone"

I agree. But hopefully Trump won't be elected again.

They were too weaponized and attacked Capitol police with a variety of weapons, see below list: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/capitol-riot-weapons-deadly-dangerous/ According to court documents reviewed by CBS News, 39 defendants have been accused of wielding "deadly or dangerous" weapons that weren't firearms, including Tasers, tomahawk axes, crowbars, flagpoles, a knife, an ice axe, a firecracker, a stun gun, baseball bats, fire extinguishers, a wooden club and chemical spray.

And they don't think that's weird.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/15/politics/fact-check-vance-trump-political-opponents/index.html Fact check: Vance falsely claims Trump did not ‘go after his political opponents’ as president Sen. JD Vance, the Republican vice presidential nominee, falsely claimed Sunday that former President Donald Trump “didn’t go after his political opponents” during his presidency – an assertion that is contradicted by a mountain of evidence. Vance, who said Friday that the attorney general would be the most important government official other than the president in a second Trump administration, was asked by ABC News host Martha Raddatz in an interview on Sunday if Trump would go after his political opponents. Vance said no, then added, “Martha, he was president for four years and he didn’t go after his political opponents.” Facts First: Vance’s claim is false. As president, Trump publicly and privately pressured the Justice Department, and others in his administration, to investigate or prosecute numerous political opponents. Trump made extensive behind-the-scenes efforts to get his political opponents charged with crimes. But you don’t have to rely on investigative reporting or the memoirs of former administration officials to know that Trump went after political opponents as president. He often went after them in public, too. As CNN reporter Marshall Cohen has noted, there is a long list of political opponents whom Trump publicly called for the Justice Department and others to investigate or prosecute. The list includes not only 2016 election opponent Hillary Clinton and 2020 election opponent Joe Biden but also Biden’s son Hunter Biden, Democratic former Secretary of State John Kerry, Trump’s former national security advisor turned critic John Bolton, Democratic former President Barack Obama, unspecified Obama administration officials, the anonymous author of a New York Times op-ed by a Trump administration official critical of Trump, MSNBC host and Trump critic Joe Scarborough, former FBI director turned Trump critic James Comey, other former FBI officials, former British spy Christopher Steele (the author of a controversial dossier of allegations against Trump), and various congressional Democrats – including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Rep. Adam Schiff of California, Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, and Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia.

It is a result of all that hateful rhetoric from the Democrats...oh, wait...

Don't try to confuse poor jonny with the facts.

Since you didn't post what the tweet actually says, who knows?

How does it feel? It feels great!

"Bill Clinton turns on Kamala Harris" He does? Wonder what Doug Emhoff thinks of that?

The Kiffness in Paris performing "They're Eating The Cats" And you can tell the audience just loves Donald singing: "Meow Meow Meow Meow" at the end.

The usual suspects here didn't think she won the debate (contrary to the opinion of most analysts and a majority of viewers) so no matter how well she does, it won't change any of their minds, but as I said, I don't think that Fox viewers and the MAGA crowd are her target audience (it is the small number of undecided voters still out there).

Yeah right, and we've seen your "scientific studies" before and they don't always seem that reputable. I am really skeptical of the claim made here about Democrats.

No, but it could erase doubts that some undecided voters have about Kamala.

How about to rebut the claim that she is afraid of doing interviews or will only do interviews with favorable media outlets?