squistion

Couldn't he just dress a little warmer?

If SAS is a big time Democrat, I'm Prince Harry.

He means criminal trial.

Of course. Donald J. Trump repeatedly and fraudulently falsified New York business records to conceal crimes that hid damaging information from the voting public during the 2016 presidential election. Anyone one else who had done that would have been similarly charged.

And Ukraine attacked Russia, right? Oh, wait...

You have yet to back up your claim that SCOTUS has ruled that Trump can have no speech restrictions by the Judge during this trial (I refer everyone to the link I posted above which proves again why you got the wrong_mx nickname at that other place).

A thread to cheer all the innocent civilians killed by Putin's invasion. SMH.

Or trying to, anyway.

It doesn't back up your claim. Sorry.

Along with whoever it was here that stands guard in front of the women's bathroom when his wife or daughter are in there so that some "pedocrat tranny killer" doesn't go in there.

Once again what you have said nothing that has to do with Trump and possible sanctions and or penalties against him that might be taken in this case.

That case is not on point. It has to do with an attorney making out of court statements, not the criminal defendant during a trial. And SCOTUS declined to hear the case and let the lower court's verdict stand. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-oct-03-na-scotus3-story.html It is absurd to contend that a criminal defendant has an unlimited right of speech during their trial and SCOTUS has never ruled that they do.

Link to where SCOTUS has said that the conduct or speech of criminal defendants in a trial cannot be limited?

The down ballot candidates need every dollar they raise. And Trump shouldn't want to take it from them as he will need every GOP member of Congress that is elected.

No, not unless they remove all the other prisoners, which is not going to happen.

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1781006086952165506 Trump has found a new way to press for badly needed cash: In a letter received by Republican digital vendors this week, the Trump campaign is asking for down-ballot candidates who use his name, image, and likeness in fundraising appeals to give at least 5% of the proceeds to the campaign. https://politico.com/news/2024/04/17/trump-campaign-fundraising-five-percent-00152830

Fun Fact: Attempted jury tampering and attempted intimidation of members of the court by the defendant in public statements is considered an exception to First Amendment freedom of speech. It is a form of censorship that is allowed to ensure the integrity of the judicial system. That said, I doubt that the judge will do it here unless Trump keeps poking the tiger.

Another one bites the dust.

All of those actions are disrespectful to the judge and the proceedings. In most criminal cases if the defendant would do any of those things they would be cited by the judge for contempt of court (and rightfully so).

It shows disrespect for the court and the judicial proceedings.