squistion

"Imagine committing so many crimes that you get bored at your own trial"

Fun Fact: We do see those daily posts like that multiple times in threads every single day (and few of those threads have to do with Biden, like this one).

A folding knife can not be used as a weapon? Try to bring in a courthouse and see what happens.

They were not armed with guns but they had weapons (clubs, sticks, bear spray, flag poles, etc.) which we have documented numerous times in this thread, including Ashli Babbitt who was carrying a weapon in the form of a folding knife.

They sidestepped that issue.

And I have no doubt you are wrong about that.

No, it means that they would proceed with the trial with him not being physically present in the courtroom. However, he would still be viewing on the trial in another room on a TV monitor, so they would not be proceeding without him knowing what was happening.

I sure he wasn't as the judge would have asked him if he understood what he had just been told.

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1779956633688306058 Judge Merchan read a list of names to potential jurors that could figure into the case. The names included: Rudy Giuliani Sharon Churcher Dan Scavino Keith Schiller Donald Trump, Jr. Ivanka Trump Melania Trump John McEntee Kellyanne Conway Jared Kushner

https://twitter.com/KatiePhang/status/1779954563920912711 Judge Merchan asks the pool of 96 prospective jurors if they self-identify to be excused b/c they cannot be fair and impartial. Per the pool: Of those 96, about 50 raised their hands and then were excused. The judge then instructed 18 of the remaining jurors to be seated inside the jury box. The third juror questioned said "Yes" to Question 34: “Do you have any strong opinions or firmly held beliefs about former president Donald Trump, or the fact that he is a current candidate for president that would interfere with your ability to be a fair and impartial juror?” Merchan sought to excuse her on that basis, to which the prosecution office agreed, but then Trump’s defense team objected. After a brief sidebar, she was excused.

Yes. Fun Fact: If it is the first time in history something has happened, then by definition, it is historic.

There is no way his attorneys will allow him to testify. If they did it would be a gift to the prosection.

But don't they keep telling us here that the Washington Post is "fake news" and not a legitimate news source? If so, then why are they having a hissy fit over just one article?

How are liberals responsible for a gang related mass shooting in Chicago? Because they are against gun control laws? Oh, wait...