squistion

At least tens of millions if they were aware of a potential lightening strike and did not delay the game until the danger passed.

Good bolded question. It would cost the NFL tens of millions if they were aware of a potential lightening strike of fans or players and did not delay the game until the danger had passed. Thanks!

At FBGs they got like a dozen lawyers in the FFA. Maybe none here, but if so, let's ask one of them to weigh in: If you were legal counsel to the NFL, would you advise them to delay a game if there is a possibility of lightening striking a fan or a player?

Which is why they halted the game.

Or perhaps you an find some attorneys here to back your take on tort liability if a fan or player is struck by lightening if the NFL is aware of the potential danger.

The NFL's legal department would advise them to halt any game if there is a threat of a lightening striking of a fan or a player. It is something that is foreseeable and could be avoided by delaying the game - and to not do so could potentially lead to liability in the tens of millions (not to mention the bad publicity).

When there's lightning you know it always brings me down

Dude, you don't think the NFL's legal department has already advised them of this? Seriously. lol

I am not the one who spelled "Philly" as "Phily" in the thread title.

"Lightning strikes maybe once, maybe twice"

You apparently know nothing about tort liability It would be negligence on the part of the NFL to let a game proceed if they were aware of a possible lightening strike on a fan or a player. And the litigation costs if the NFL somehow prevailed (which I doubt) would still be in the millions (plus the bad publicity for allowing this to happen).

Irrelevant as I am sure the NFL's legal department has already instucted them to stop all games with the threat of lightening WITH NO EXCEPTION.

If a player or a fan are struck and killed by lightening, how much do you think it would cost the NFL in a lawsuit?

Dallas as Phily Phily?

I don't think she was ever expecting this, just voicing that it is something to be legitimately concerned about.

Straw Man. Warnock is not blaming this solely on RFK Jr. He thinks he should resign for his stance against vaccinatioins.

I don't have the information on all the deaths, however it does not appear that they were vaccinated. https://www.dshs.texas.gov/news-alerts/texas-announces-second-death-measles-outbreak Texas announces second death in measles outbreak The Texas Department of State Health Services is reporting the second measles death of a Texas resident in the ongoing outbreak centered in the state's South Plains region. The school-aged child who tested positive for measles was hospitalized in Lubbock and passed away on Thursday from what the child’s doctors described as measles pulmonary failure. The child was not vaccinated and had no reported underlying conditions.

https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1963648248624668771 (video clip at link) BREAKING: Senator Raphael Warnock just called for RFK Jr. to resign: "For the first time, we are seeing deaths of children from Measles. We haven’t seen that in two decades. We are seeing that under your watch. You are a hazard to the American people. I think that you ought to resign."

https://x.com/atrupar/status/1963622117645115772 (video clip at link) WARNER: Do you accept the fact that 1 million Americans died from covid? RFK Jr: I don't know how many died WARNER: You're the secretary of health and human services. You don't have any idea how many Americans died from covid? RFK Jr: I don't think anybody knows that because there was so much data chaos coming out of the CDC WARNER: How can you be that ignorant?

Well, no...but my perception (which may be incorrect) is that you tend to agree with folks here like Hell Toupee and his ilk.

Wait, what...we are past the need for herd immunity?

Don't need a link. Just have to look at the opinions expressed in your posts which echo their talking points.