squistion

This was an exact quote of the exchange between the judge and Trump's lawyer, not BS.

I have and unlike you I actually read the news and no one in the Democratic Party has suggested that Biden could order a SEAL Team 6 to assassinate a political rival, like Trump's lawyer did the other day. As reported by CNN's Jim Acosta on Twitter:

The Innocence Project has helped free a lot of wrongfully convicted people over the years, but I don't see how Scott Peterson falls into that category.

It makes plenty of sense if you have read what he and his attorneys have been saying: That a President is essentially a King and can never be prosecuted for anything he had done in office, even if it were unquestionably illegal (like having a political opponent assassinated, which is a hypothetical a judge asked his lawyers about recently in his court case).

Translation: "If you remove immunity I won't be able to do anything I want to and never be held accountable"

Adderall can do that.

It did happen, but it was not widespread, appears to be just a one off.

No, just reportedly just this one paper.

Not a chance.

Meh.

No she didn't support the George Floyd riots. Liar.

The only source I see about the Ted Kennedy quote is from Trump and isunverified anywhere else.

So eloquent. You should start a blog.

Donald Trump claims Ted Kennedy said that but there is no verification outside of Trump's statement. Nor is there proof he cheated his way through college. He did admit that he had plagiarized parts of a paper he submitted as a first-year law student in 1965, but that is the extent of it.

Secret cabal of leftists calling the shots. You poor thing.

I didn't report them for anything. Just pointing out people have been making these silly short predictions about Biden's health since he took office and none of them have come true, and this one probably won't either.

For making stupid predictions? No.

Nonsense. I am old enough to remember in the PSF, predictions by several posters that he wouldn't even last the first six months after he was elected. Then it was pushed back to the end of his first year. They kept kicking the can down the road just like we are seeing here.

Meh. Trump the is one you should be concerned with. His speeches seem to be getting progressively more incoherent with all the crazy stuff he has been saying.

I don't think any judge would let it into evidence as it falls under the category of being more prejudicial than probative.

Apparently not to the jury who ruled UNANIMOUSLY in her favor after hearing testimony from both her and Trump. And the fact her cat is named Vagina was completely irrelevant to the issues of the case, which is why the judge did not allow it into testimony.