Jump to content

squistion

Members
  • Content Count

    12,813
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Everything posted by squistion

  1. I don't believe Hillary ever claimed she lost because of voter or election fraud. And she did concede right after the election, unlike Trump who still claims that he actually won in 2020.
  2. Which you shouldn't do because people can quote it months or years later and then the burden is on me to prove that it's a fake quote.
  3. squistion

    Nikki Haley in 2024!

    https://x.com/kylegriffin1/status/1793385095811706882 Nikki Haley just said she's voting for Trump.
  4. Don't change my quotes to make it appear I made a statement that I didn't.
  5. His family is directly enriching itself off this trial because his daughter is employed at a Democratic consulting firm? You have got to be kidding.
  6. With the bolded he was joking or being sarcastic. The second one was just a typical Biden gaff he has made as long he has been in politics.
  7. squistion

    Black on Black Violence: Darwin Style

    Black on black violence, Darwin Style?
  8. No, we keep telling you they were Democrats then but that is not where the Democratic Party is now and blacks know it which is why they overwhelmingly vote for Democratic Party candidates.
  9. Well, yeah, it is his party affiliation, but you would never know it from his public statements in recent years.
  10. squistion

    Harrison Butker, geek club hero

    https://x.com/TheDailyShow/status/1792979565679128989 "Enjoy the PTA bitches" is not the thing graduates want to hear at graduation. @jonstewart on Harrison Butker
  11. How else do you get him to stop if he thinks the worse that can happen is being sent to the pokey for contempt?
  12. It wasn't just an eye roll, there were a bunch of other things besides that. Merchan gave a list of what Costello was doing that he found objectionalbe (among them - loudly sighing, and muttering under his breath "Jesus" that was audible to the jury (the list can be found in a Katie Phang tweet I posted yesterday (I believe).
  13. So, no, she wasn't admonished by the judge for her behavior or threatened with being in contempt of court. Thank you.
  14. What she threatened by a judge with being cited for contempt? I don't think so.
  15. Maybe I missed that part, but I don't believe she was the criminal defendant in a trial and it was not before a jury.
  16. https://x.com/KatiePhang/status/1793024110546571392 BOVE: Next on my list is a proposed jury instruction about involvement of counsel, despite Merchan's pre-trial rulings that Trump himself could not argue that he was convinced of the lawfulness of his conduct because lawyers were involved/he relied on his lawyers. MERCHAN: This is an issue that’s been going on for a very long time. Going back to I think it was December of '23, I’m not sure. The People filed a motion asking this court to require the defense to require and give notice whether defense was going to rely on advice of counsel. I wrote a decision on this on Feb 7 and I directed defense to provide disclosure by March 11, and to produce all discoverable statements and comms by same date. In response, the answer was we are not relying on advice of counsel. Later on, defense advice of counsel morphed into something called presence of counsel, which I had never heard of, not familiar with, but addressed it in a motion in limine. MERCHAN: I ordered that you were precluded from arguing this legal claim. There was no such thing. Just a way to get around having to turn over docs. MERCHAN: Now it’s morphed into involvement of counsel. I understand why you want this instruction from the court. But my answer hasn't changed and I find it disingenuous. MERCHAN: It was concerning when the terms changed to "presence of counsel." I couldn't believe when i saw it again now calling it "involvement of counsel." MERCHAN: My ruling is the jury will not hear that instruction from the bench nor are you permitted to make that argument. Period.
  17. Rolling your eyes at the judge is considered contempt of court and if it were to be allowed again it would show disrespect to the court and to the proceedings.
  18. Yes, because he has been warned that would be one of the possible consequences of doing that.
×