squistion

Why do you ignore the DNA evidence that shows he was the only perpetrator and exonerates The Central Park Five?

They found the real perpetrator. He confessed and his DNA confirmed it (only one found on victim) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Park_jogger_case Discovery of assailant[edit] In 2001, Matias Reyes met Wise when they were held at the Auburn Correctional Facility in upstate New York.[75][76][77][78] Reyes subsequently informed a corrections officer that he had raped Meili.[79][80][81] In 2002, Reyes told officials that on the night of April 19, 1989, he had assaulted and raped the female jogger. He was 17 years old at the time of the assault and said that he had committed it alone.[4][81] He also said that he had intended to burglarize the victim's apartment.[82][83] Reyes was then working at an East Harlem convenience store on Third Avenue and 102nd Street, and living in a van on the street.[81][13]: 115  Reyes was believed to have raped another woman in the same area of the park during the day on April 17, two days before the attack on Meili. Initially the Meili case was investigated as a homicide, and the April 17 rape was investigated as a rape assault, which resulted in a lack of comparison of the DNA recovered in the two cases.[84] The NYPD did not have a DNA database until 1994; after that, detectives and prosecutors had access to common information about DNA from evidence and taken from suspects in certain crimes.[84] During the summer of 1989, Reyes raped four women, killing one, and was interrupted after robbing a fifth—he was sentenced to 33+1⁄2 years to life after he pleaded guilty to the top counts in each case.[11]: ¶ 38  District Attorney Robert Morgenthau's office was notified of the confession in 2002.[11] Morgenthau appointed a team led by Assistant District Attorneys Nancy Ryan and Peter Casolaro to investigate the case, based on Reyes's confession and a review of evidence.[29] Reyes provided officials with a detailed account of the attack, details of which were corroborated by other evidence which the police held. In addition, his DNA matched the DNA evidence at the scene, confirming that he was the sole source of the semen found in and on the victim "to a factor of one in 6,000,000,000 people".[11] Reyes' DNA matched the semen found on Meili, and he provided other confirmatory evidence.[64][85]

Yes. Based on coerced confessions with no actual proof, none.

The proof was coerced testimony, but there was no actual evidence any of the 5 convicted were involved in the crime.

That is a Straw Man argument I've seen in this forum, which is frequently alleged, but no one on the left actually thinks that or has said it.

What was false? That it wasn't a mass shooting? That he was transgender?

I think the motive for the discussion in the "illegals threads" is more about trashing the illegals rather than any real concern about the "little girls" involved in the sex trafficking (but I hope I am wrong).

That was a mass shooting, not a terrorist attack and no proof that the shooter was transgender.

Rhetorical question.

I don't recall seeing any of those.

They were innocent of the charges and completely exonerated. The police coerced confessions and framed them.

Yes (if nothing else a public defender) but what would they get a settlement for if the charges are correct and they are guilty of this?

There is no proof that Bill Clinton ever raped any girls (there may with the Epstein file investigation, but we should wait before we make any accusations) I don't recall seeing a thread about the "poor girls being raped in migrant camps" although there might have been one.

The League of United Latin American Citizens will defend the person(s) who did this heinous crime?

I wasn't speaking for blacks, I was quoting blacks (see my first post in this thread).

So eloquent. Do you have your own blog?

A "crackpot" who is well respected as a prosecutor and will nail Trump's posterior to the wall. It will be a prosecution and conviction that will be studied in law schools for the next hundred years.

That was just one case. And he was a prosecutor at The Hague among other things: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Smith_(lawyer) John Luman Smith (born June 5, 1969) is an American attorney who has served in the United States Department of Justice as an assistant U.S. attorney, acting U.S. attorney, and head of the department's Public Integrity Section. He was also the chief prosecutor at the Kosovo Specialist Chambers, an international tribunal at The Hague tasked with investigating and prosecuting war crimes in the Kosovo War.

Like Jack Smith?

Who do you think should have investigated the conduct of the Capitol Police on Jan 6 besides officials in DC and the FBI?

If you are as intelligent as you claim, you should know the difference between speaking figuratively and literally.

I was talking figuratively not literally.

Do you seriously think I meant no one (not one person) on the internet?

Blacks aren't intellectually qualified to debate with you?

I always love how people who complain about blacks and othes wanting a free ride and living off free stuff from the government are the first to criticize someone working a low pay fast food job trying to make ends meet rather than go on welfare or state assistance.