squistion

Yes. Fun Fact: If it is the first time in history something has happened, then by definition, it is historic.

There is no way his attorneys will allow him to testify. If they did it would be a gift to the prosection.

But don't they keep telling us here that the Washington Post is "fake news" and not a legitimate news source? If so, then why are they having a hissy fit over just one article?

How are liberals responsible for a gang related mass shooting in Chicago? Because they are against gun control laws? Oh, wait...

What is the media doing again? I seem to have missed that part.

Quoting one psychiatrist no one has ever heard of. Indeed, that is persuasive.

I remember the shelves being empty of Toilet Paper, packaged Pasta and Rice due to panic buying. I often wonder if those folks who loaded up their SUVs with shopping carts full of Toilet Paper have actually all used it by now.

The White House was invaded?

An illegal adlinthin? He didn't even try to correct himself.

No because what he did would not be considered attempted murder in any jurisdiction. He didn't take a shot at Rittenhouse (which might be considered attempted murder depending on the circumstances). He was chasing Rittenhouse, who he thought had committed a murder and was fleeing the scene of the crime. Grosskreutz was trying to stop him, so that he could be held for authorities (which was a poorly thought-out plan to chase someone who carrying an assault rifle he had just used to kill someone).

Rachel Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar...just sayin'

Quit repeating that lie.

No one has yet to support looting here, kids. But please, carry on.

I have no problem with the legal doctrine of adverse possession that goes back for centuries.

Keep lying, jonny.

Another parody account.

Not true.

No proof of that, but carry on.