squistion

Notice it said : Not all homeless are migrants. I wouldn't think that housing homeless veterans would make you sick, but maybe it does.

That won't happen, you just can't remove someone from a ballot because you disagree with policy decisions that they have made.

No I won't. I want everyone to see this and the link disproving the false claim, so we won't see this lie repeated again.

It is a fake story and has been debunked. Shame on you for repeating this lie.

False story per AP: https://apnews.com/article/migrants-veterans-evictions-new-york-buses-hoax-be45e60b829c35352ac236d1c2ca15cf Group accused of making up story about homeless vets being evicted to make room for migrants NEW YORK (AP) — The founder of a nonprofit group has been accused of fabricating a story about homeless military veterans being evicted from a New York hotel to make room for migrants, a tale that stoked days of outrage on cable news networks. One Republican lawmaker in New York who helped spread the story is now calling for an investigation, saying he and others were duped. [...] Cracks in the story emerged after an investigation by a local newspaper, the Mid Hudson News. The managers of the hotel told the paper the story wasn’t true. A receipt purporting to show that the Crossroads Hotel had been paid $37,800 to house the veterans appeared to have been sloppily doctored. In a follow-up report Friday, the Mid-Hudson News reported that several men staying at a homeless shelter in Poughkeepsie, New York, had come forward to say they were recruited to pretend they were among the veterans kicked out of the hotel. The paper quoted some of the men as saying they were offered $200, food and alcohol to take part in the ruse.

Not according to the article you linked.

Open means no restrictions, that anyone can wander across the border either way without restrictions or any hinderance.

Imagine a grown man calling Biden, diaper Joe.

Facts are a lefty talking point. Don't you just love it.

LOL the caravan again.

No, we don't have open borders. And I don't know of any liberals or Democrats who approve of or accept gay sex in the senate or anywhere in public.

Meh.

If you believe it will only be for one day, then I got some ocean front property in Arizona I'd like to sell you.

8 good years? It has been obvious and well documented by the video clips of his recent speeches that he suffering from dementia.

As we have been saying, if get elected again he will be POTUS for life. He will never voluntary step down and will use the force of the government to stay in power indefinitely (like his buddy Putin). He says he will be a dictator on Day 1, so we should believe him.

Wait...what? He's a "Homo" who has attacked FB Gays for years?

And in what cases was her publisher involved?

Nope.

No, but according to almost all legal experts, he should have.

The so called extortion is disputed. Did she rule on any cases involving these books or her book sales?

Give me an example with a liberal leaning SCOTUS judge where it would apply.

When was the last time a liberal SCOTUS justice was accused of ruling on a case that would suggest perceived improprieties?

According to the rules of judicial ethics, he should have. All judges except those on SCOTUS are held to that standard.

Maybe because they haven't accepted any gifts from those who have an interest in a case before the court that it will rule on (unlike Thomas).

He didn't recuse himself with a case before him that involved a contributor that treated him to a luxury vacation (and he should have as per legal experts on judicial ethics).