squistion

Fun Fact: Dressing in drag is not a gay sex act.

In theory, yes. Although some cases allow one to challenge a law on the grounds that "chills' their right to free speech or free expressioin.

Dude, you were the one to bring the kids into it here. Shame on you.

It doesn't give specific examples...but yes, for instance, they could probably openly express being heterosexual in public (like kissing or holding hands) without any legal consequences, unlike say, a male who could be arrested for expressing their homosexuality by dressing in drag for a Pride parade.

The ordinance as written covers a lot more than that.

It can be viewed an expression of being homosexual (or LGBTQ) and acts of homosexuality are considered "sexual conduct" under the ordinance. It is all open to interpretation and selective enforcement which is why the ACLU is opposing it and it will not withstand a court challenge.

Fallswell is quoting directly from the city code.

Homosexuality by itself is considered "sexual conduct" so, that means, being gay or being identified as gay in public is illegal under this ordinance.

No, Straw Man, the OP doesn't admit or even suggest that.

"Harmful to minors in accordance with the social morals of the community" is vague and could involve selective enforcement against LBGTQ folks, such as for displaying a rainbow flag (for those who believe that it could influence impressionable children into believing being gay, lesbian or trans is OK).

Rioting for the DNC?

Of course you can't grasp it.

Reading is fundamental.

Not true. No proof that those participating in the riots of 2020 and beyond did so for Biden, lol.

Yes, we can. It is what is known as a "lynching."

I knew it.

Without clicking the link, is this just another black-on-white crime reported from our non-racist friend Jon? (And if so what is the point?).

You must be a lot of fun at parties.

Meh. As usual nothing to see here.

Do you have a link to the FBI and DOJ saying that? I couldn't find that with a Google search. And wasn't it her former employer who had fired her? If so that would qualify as workplace related violence.