squistion

I provided links, bucko.

Hardly a profound observation that gay child molesters exist in the world along with straight/heterosexual child molesters. And studies have shown that most child molesters are heterosexual. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1556756/ https://stopabusecampaign.org/2017/03/10/are-most-sex-abusers-heterosexual/ https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2011/10-anti-gay-myths-debunked

Of course, there are gay child molesters. Who excuses that? The lie is that gays can only continue their numbers by molesting children, the canard is that is how they reproduce, not that LGBT folks are born that way.

No, I said it was discredited because it was discredited. IIRC most gays/lesbians in the study said they were gay before they were "molested" so the "findings" of the study showing a correlation or causation between "molestation" and homosexuality meant absolutely nothing.

"Everything must go!"

No, you haven't it proved it once. You linked to a discredited study and that was it.

A total and complete lie that has been told for decades and that has no statistics to back it up.

No, on the realist team.

And I'm old enough to remember that most liberals and Democrats didn't really think they were against gay marriage on a personal level.

Thank you!

I keep misreading this thread title as: Timmy’s threat for serious discussion and debate Which somehow seems for appropriate in a way.

She's joking and having fun with the homophobes/transphobes. Ridiculing those who say her book will turn kids "gay"

Timmy, We have seen this movie and know how it ends. In the PSF you set up your own General Malaise discussion type thread where people would come to you, while you agreed to stay out of all other political threads. The problem was, only a few folks came to your vanity thread to discuss the topics you wanted to discuss, while there were heated discussions in other threads that you wanted to be a part of, but couldn't. Ultimately, you found this unsatisfactory and went back to posting in all forum threads just as before, and there is no reason to believe that the same will not happen here.

That he's dead? That he died in prison after Putin had him sent there?

That is the point, one can't tell if they have it for a period of time after becoming infected (I read somewhere that the first symptoms of HIV infection take about 2 years to appear).

Unknowingly is the deal breaker with this law and it should be invalidated for that reason alone.

Exactly. No matter who appointed the judge, Democrat or Republican, the ruling should have been the same.