Jump to content

squistion

Members
  • Content Count

    12,045
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Everything posted by squistion

  1. Yeah, he just makes up stuff, claims he saw it live, but can never provide a link or any proof it actually happened.
  2. No proof that those waving Mexican flags protesting ICE are here illegally and want to rape our women. L.A. has a high Latino population and most of those are from Mexico and are legal US citizens.
  3. squistion

    Live On Twitch - The Natives Are Looting in LA

    No looting confirmed and the only fire was in a dumpster. The OP lied about seeing fires and looting in real time and no one has provided a link to the contrary.
  4. squistion

    Live On Twitch - The Natives Are Looting in LA

    No link, of course from the OP. There are reports of looting but so far nothing has been confirmed from any credible news source.
  5. https://x.com/SenAdamSchiff/status/1931536364065247309 @SenAdamSchiff The Trump Administration’s calling on the California National Guard without the authorization of the Governor is unprecedented. This action is designed to inflame tensions, sow chaos, and escalate the situation. If the Guard is needed to restore peace, the Governor will ask for it. But continuing down this path will erode trust in the National Guard and set a dangerous precedent for unilateral misuse of the Guard across the country. Violence must stop, and we need to keep the focus on protecting fundamental rights. There is nothing President Trump would like more than a violent confrontation with protestors to justify the unjustifiable — invocation of the Insurrection Act or some form of martial law.
  6. Yes and I think to the tune of 15 million is what Trump paid to Bukele to take Garcia and the others.
  7. https://twitter.com/grok/status/1931525451530551639 The claim that Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles is confirmed by sources like Sky News and Fox News, citing violent anti-ICE protests on June 7, 2025. The deployment aims to protect federal officers and restore order. However, California officials, including Governor Newsom, criticize it as federal overreach, arguing it may escalate tensions and infringe on state rights. The issue is divisive, with valid points on both sides.
  8. I know that none of us were alive when it happened, but if people on this forum can support the Jan 6 attack on the Capitol maybe there are some here that will defend what the Japanese did on Dec 7, 1941. Some explanations we may hear (off the top of my head): 1) It was not an act of war, but a normal tourist visit, where they just happened to drop some bombs. 2) They had cameras on the wings and wanted to send some selfies to the folks back home. 3) The attack was a false flag planned by the FBI who had infiltrated the Japanese Air Force. Any other ideas?
  9. Exactly. They keep trying to spin this as a win for Trump and a loser for Democrats, but I just can't see it.
  10. squistion

    Who here still supports the Pearl Harbor attack?

    Just to give some much needed context to the creation of this thread. On this forum at that time, there were a whole series of threads entitled something like: "Who here still supports the US Civil War?" and "Who here still supports the D-Day invasion?" etc.(probably at least a half dozen). They were all joking variations of a thread that someone started "Who here supports" (something, can't remember now) and this was my contribution to the list.
  11. Which the transphobes are digging the bottom of the news barrel to find.
  12. I believe I spoke out against it on the PSF, since he was a US citizen. It was a gray area since he had joined a terrorist organization that was plotting attacks against the US IIRC. We don't deny anyone the right due process in this country under the Constitution just because they are a bad person. The concept is, that if Trump is allowed to do that against Garcia then he would have the right to arrest anyone, citizen or non-citizen and throw them in a foreign prison with no charges brought against them or any justification ever given by the government. I am amazed that Conservatives and Republcans support what was done to Garcia because the ends justify the means (even though they are un-constitutional).
  13. As noted earlier we are backing the concept of due process in the Constitution, not Abrego Garcia, per se. I would imagine that most Americans understand the real issues involved in this case. And it should be noted that police never charged Abrego Garcia with domestic violence.
  14. squistion

    Zelensky and Ukraine Thread

  15. Translation. Trump lies a lot. He was being completely disengenous that he couldn't bring Garcia back. Now he has egg on his face.
  16. You edited out the part where I noted that I am against trans males competeing against women. Still this so seldom happends that it is not newsworthy IMO and certainly not enough for each incident merit its own thread.
  17. I am on record saying that trans (male) should not be allowed to compete against girls/women. But I don't get the obsession of starting new threads about this constantly in this forum.
  18. We are not cheering for the guy, we are cheering for following the Constituion. And they have yet to prove that he is a "human trafficker"
  19. The one with falsified information that they probably can't back up with any proof at the hearing when he comes back?
  20. https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1931068691849814337 BREAKING: Kilmar Abrego Garcia is coming back to the the United States from El Salvador in order to face due process. HUGE LOSS FOR TRUMP! HUGE WIN FOR THE CONSTITUTION!
  21. I specifically asked for proof to show that the definintion of racism had offically changed and what I got instead was "defining racism beyond its dictionary meaning"
×