squistion

In this thread, I think not. And if it was somewhere else I am sure I had something to back it up if you would like to revisit it.

Fine. Then shut the hell up about me "spending far too much time speculating on what people think".

So, threads that specifically name and bash individual posters here are OK as long as it is not you? If so, got it.

Maybe because Patented Phil and Hell Toupee are constantly creating threads ridiculing me and asking that I be banned by the moderator. Don't remember you ever complaning about that.

And the reason the inmate is hooded is that firing squad members couldn't handle the "victim" looking at them and were haunted by it afterwards.

Because they are "treating certain classes of people VERY BADLY" Translation: Certain classes = White people. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/trump-cut-off-all-future-funding-south-africa-2025-02-02/ Trump to cut off funding for South Africa over expropriation act WASHINGTON, Feb 2 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Sunday, without citing evidence, that "certain classes of people" in South Africa were being treated "very badly" and that he would cut off funding for the country until the matter is investigated. "South Africa is confiscating land, and treating certain classes of people VERY BADLY," Trump said in a Truth Social post. "The United States won't stand for it, we will act. Also, I will be cutting off all future funding to South Africa until a full investigation of this situation has been completed!" he said. The United States obligated nearly $440 million in assistance to South Africa in 2023, the most recent U.S. government data showed. Last month South African President Cryil Ramaphosa signed into law a bill that would make it easier for the state to expropriate land in the public interest. The law aims to address racial disparities in land ownership that persist three decades after apartheid's demise in 1994. [...]

Sure looked that way. Let's see if you draw or don't draw any conclusions from the responses.

Not going to happen. 90% of Canadians are opposed to joining the US. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canada-join-u-s-poll-1.7434317 Join the U.S.? No way, say most Canadians surveyed. But nearly a quarter may be open to it 'That survey found just a small minority, one out of 10 Canadians surveyed, would support the idea of Canada joining the U.S., but that the vast majority, 90 per cent, were opposed. '

Which is why the OP is rather disingenuous in that it won't prove anything if no one comes forward and says they can't afford a dozen eggs.

Not even the most fanantical Biden supporter.

From the link, this was Newsom's explanation, which I don't necessarily agree with: “In-person work makes us all stronger — period,” he said in a statement. “When we work together, collaboration improves, innovation thrives, and accountability increases. That means better service, better solutions, and better results for Californians, while still allowing flexibility.”

https://x.com/kylegriffin1/status/1897702725971824740 TORONTO (AP) - Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau says he expects Canada and the US to be in a trade war for the foreseeable future.

They have temporary, not permanent refugee legal status, that's how. https://x.com/cenkuygur/status/1897662453250498917 Reuters is reporting Trump is going to pull temporary protection status for 240,000 Ukrainians here. Then they can be deported back to the middle of the war. Those people are innocent and had nothing to do with hurting Trump’s precious feelings. This is what a cruel person does.

This is either about appeasing Putin or just being vindictive (maybe both) https://x.com/Megatron_ron/status/1897612242142519440 BREAKING: Trump to deport Ukrainian refugees Trump administration plans to revoke legal status for 240.000 Ukrainiana who fled to US - Reuters

They (Trump/Vance/MAGA) said that Biden was responsible for the high cost of eggs, but now that Trump is POTUS they say that he has no control over egg prices. Go figure.

https://x.com/sandibachom/status/1897643591591186527 Trump listing the dead people on Social Security is, 'they're eating the cats and dogs' this is a LIE because the teen coders didn't understand the code when they hacked. It defaults to ZERO. Something has to break. A Wizard of Oz moment to save democracy.

https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1897397441587978541 (video clip at lilnk) WOW! Moments ago, Alberta, Canada Premier Danielle Smith just completely turned the argument around on President Trump, calling out his misinformation. “The Problem at our border appears to be drugs coming up from the US and into Canada — cocaine or crystal meth. The issue of migrants seems to be exclusively people coming across from the United States into Canada… We are not seeing the same in reverse.”

And after condeming me for posting a partial quote, Phil didn't give Nicole Wallaces' entire quote either (although he claimed he did). For those who want a more complete context: https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/msnbc-nicolle-wallace-maddow-trump-speech-maga-b2709500.html “Problem is, in the beauty of that child is the tragedy of the Trump presidency, because we don’t know how he survived pediatric cancer, but it is likely he benefited from some sort of cancer research,” Wallace stated. “And it is a fact that Trump has slashed cancer research. It’s a fact, by eliminating NIH and by all the cuts, pediatric cancer trials are halted.” “I hope he has a long life as a law enforcement officer, but I hope he never has to defend the United States Capitol against Donald Trump’s supporters and if he does, I hope he isn’t one of the six who loses his life to suicide,” she declared. “And I hope he isn’t one that has to testify against the people who carried out acts of seditious conspiracy and then lived to see Donald Trump pardon those people.”

Exactly, and Nicole Wallace put this in perspective: https://x.com/resistupdates/status/1897145892354027746 (video clip at link) MSNBC's Nicole Wallace: “I hope he never has to defend the United States capitol against Donald Trump's supporters.”

Canadians don't think so, as shown for their overwhelming approval of his comments yesterday for standing up to Trump's bullying.

Irrelevant to Canadians supporting his comments from yesterday.

Except that NYT or WaPo don't link to Breitbart or Treehouse (whatever that is).

Apples and Oranges comparison.

She knows the difference and they were just trying to get a "gotcha" answer on a point of semantics.

Fine jonny, how bout you say the exact same thing to the OP?