Jump to content

HenryChinaski

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    3,539

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by HenryChinaski

  1. Posted

    McCoy looks awful out there. Whiffing on pass protection and dropping checkdowns <_<

     

    Did Westbrook have a catch for negative 12 yards?

     

    because that is what cbssports.com is saying... I find it hard to believe, but I'm not watching the game.

  6. Posted

    I'm not sure why anyone was high on him this season.

     

    People should have watched his touches in preseason, instead of buying all of that ridiculous hype in the off-season.

     

    He can't make people miss anymore, while also not being able to break tackles. After that, there really isn't much left.

     

    He can definitely still be a decent RB for them to split carries with, but Sproles is just the better player right now, and has been for a while now.

     

    And what the fock is the OP talking about? Does he really think someone is going to trade for LT? You might get Nate Burleson for him, if you're lucky.

  8. Posted

    where are you reading this? i've been looking for info, one way or the other

     

    It would make sense that if he wasn't going to play this week, that they waited until after their Week 4 bye week, mainly because they play Kansas City in Week 3.

  9. Posted

    You actually talk with your wife about discussions on this stupid FF board? Holy crap, that is the funniest thing I've ever heard. How pathetic.........no offense, of course.

     

    :shocking: :thumbsup: :lol:

     

    Ha, I was thinking the same thing.

  10. Posted

    Sean peyton realizes why he gave the reigns to thomas last year and makes him the majorty share holder with bell on 3rd down situations.

     

     

    Why the fock would Mike Bell become the third down back?

     

    Have you ever actually watched him or Pierre Thomas play? Do you know what being a third down back entails?

  11. Posted

    He needs 13 targets to produce a measly 66 yards and that's supposed to be impressive? Sorry, my league doesn't give points for targets. And those targets seemed to be mostly little dinks and dunks over the middle. Once Cutler discovers that Greg Olsen is his tight end, we'll see if Bennett continues to get that many looks.

     

    As for Hester, he will be inconsistent and will not catch 90 balls, but he certainly has the ability to be one of the top homerun hitters in the league.

     

    That is pretty ignorant.

     

    Let me guess? Earl Bennett isn't on any of your fantasy teams, right?

     

    Just for future reference: Targets is one of the most important ways of telling what is really going on in a football game, if you weren't able to watch it. The WR who leads his team in targets, is most likely going to lead that team in fantasy points. The two go hand in hand, sorry if you don't feel the same way.

     

    And so what if Earl Bennett didn't seem like he stretched the field? So I guess Wes Welker doesn't have much fantasy value either, right?

     

    Regardless of how people perceived Cutler to play Monday night, it is pretty obvious that they didn't trade for him just so he can hand the ball off. They are going to pass the ball a ton, which tends to lead to gaudy stats. The Packers have one of the better secondaries in the league, especially their CBs. So as Cutler gets more acquainted with his WRs, and his schedule lightens up, he still should have a pretty damn good fantasy season.

     

    And if your league gets heavily penalized for INTs, then he probably shouldn't have been on your team in the first place. But for all other leagues, he and Earl Bennett are going to be some very nice players to have as the season progresses.

  22. Posted

    I think he's kind of getting overrated, and I'm a homer.

     

    He should be really solid, but I think people are expecting a bit much. And to say that he's going to outproduce Westbrook and Gore, just seems like a serious stretch.

×