3.12 Oakland Raiders D/ST

[Steve14 0]

Sorry if I held you guys up at all, dunno if I did.

 

-Steve

[whoisjgalt 0]

14 teams in this league - right?

 

Why would did this DT get cut?

 

(Or should I not intrude?)

[DrJ 0]

14 teams in this league - right? 

 

Why would did this DT get cut? 

 

(Or should I not intrude?)

Owner already has Baltimore and a deep roster

 

http://league.xdl.us:8080/teamid_5.htm

[whoisjgalt 0]

14 teams in this league - right? 

 

Why would did this DT get cut? 

 

(Or should I not intrude?)

Owner already has Baltimore and a deep roster

 

http://league.xdl.us:8080/teamid_5.htm

Okay, but I guess I'd rather have a really good backup DT than Avon Cobourne or the 5th WAS WR. Maybe that's just me.

[Topes 0]

1) I'd rather have Cobourne and an 8th-round defense, which I can later cut for another defense that is showing promise.

 

2) I need a second defense for week six and nothing more.

 

3) Defenses are a crapshoot.

 

4) IF I were to want to draft a GOOD defense for my team, I would not be allowed to do so until AFTER all other teams had TWO defenses on their roster, under our curent rules.

[Topes 0]

Who is the fifth Washington WR? If I knew exactly who was and will remain the #5, perhaps I'd cut him. However, having gradually developed an unholy fixation on the cheap Washington WRs in a very deep league, I feel very little need to break them up.

[Topes 0]

When they were cut, I still had the 4.03 pick.

 

As OAK routinely gets drafted before the fourth round, the drop also could have improved the field at 4.03.

 

 

 

Also, our defensive scoring system heavily favors the return game. Oakland's return game has soured over the past year and a half.