mec411 0 Posted September 14, 2007 If I offer the guy Housh and Foster for TO, his backs are Jacobs and Lendale, he has NO depth at RB and still has Boldin. Would he do it? Â ill help you Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeyt7 1 Posted September 14, 2007 I wouldnt do it If I were him, but its a good effort  http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=287109 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
treewarden 1 Posted September 14, 2007 You realize you'll have zero RB depth w/o Foster? Â I'd shop TO for a better RB than Foster (RBBC), but you never know how desperate he might be... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bobpate17 0 Posted September 14, 2007 tell you the truth I wouldn't do it. but it also depends on how dry WW is. Â Â http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=287100 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mec411 0 Posted September 14, 2007 tell you the truth I wouldn't do it. but it also depends on how dry WW is. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=287100 Â its a 14 tema league, and we have a terrible league where fa can be gotten in the middle of a game on sunday which leaves the ww dry...and it is bone dry..and now that im thinking about it, i may not do it, my rbs would be baren...though to is an upgrade over housh, no? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
emartin 0 Posted September 14, 2007 I wouldnt do it if I were you. Owens and Housh are both top 10 WR's in my opinion and I think Foster might have a few good weeks. Depth is not a bad thing to have. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mec411 0 Posted September 14, 2007 bump..ill respond Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bauman88 0 Posted September 14, 2007 I'd rather have TO Â Thanks! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Pauly 0 Posted September 14, 2007 I'd say stand pat. The Cowboys Offense looked unstoppable against the lowly Giants, I'd give them at least one more week to see how things go. I also agree with the other posters about preserving running back depth on your part. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dbuofi7 0 Posted September 14, 2007 I agree with the rest - you're opening yourself up to some issues at RB by losing Foster. Housh isn't that much of a downgrade from TO. Â Please see mine: http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=287019 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
horsepower43 0 Posted September 14, 2007 to is better than both of those guys COMBINED but you always miss 100% of the shots you don't take  if i were him id be offended Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
COACHG137 0 Posted September 14, 2007 I like to have RB depth .TJ should have another good year . I would stay put unless you can get another rb Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mec411 0 Posted September 15, 2007 I like to have RB depth .TJ should have another good year . I would stay put unless you can get another rb  yeah i think im staying put, i think housh has at least 80 rec and 1000 9tds this year (conservative rec and yards i think)...not too much worse than what i think TO will have (90, 1200, 11) and not enough to kill my rb depth, i at least will have a viable starter to plug in on bye weeks, without him, i have sammie morris, woo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites