mistahgeorge 0 Posted September 15, 2007 Johnson @ CHI Maroney vs. SD Jordan @ DEN Standard scoring, no ppr. I know the knee-jerk reaction might be Johnson and Maroney as they are my top 2. ASYS sure, but no one can say LJ @ CHI isn't cause for concern. I've even seen it predicted on one site that Jordon puts up almost as many points as Johnson and Maroney combined (17-16)! What's a fella to do? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ashieash 0 Posted September 15, 2007 Pretty crappy matchups if you ask me. I'd go with your 2 best johnson and maroney. I dont trust Lamont against anyone but the Lions at home. But overall not good matchups for anyone Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smedia 0 Posted September 15, 2007 I like Jonson and Maroney... Jordan is a disaster waiting to happen... Please Answer Mine http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=287546 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slim Pickins 0 Posted September 15, 2007 Pretty crappy matchups if you ask me. I'd go with your 2 best johnson and maroney. I dont trust Lamont against anyone but the Lions at home. But overall not good matchups for anyone Good advice. In a case like this (where all are equally ranked) you have to go with your best players. LJ - KC will give him more carries (he only had 10 last weekend) and they are swinging him out for more catches in space. He should see more of a workload. Maroney - the Pats will work him into the gameplan. He will be a force to reckon with this week as SD will have to respect the pass. Jordan - there's a QB change and I'm not sure how this pans out. Jordan is the classic high-risk-high-reward player and, unfortunately, will take a few weeks to see how consistent he will be. Still, Jordan is awesome on the dump/swing pass. G/L Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vicksdawgs 0 Posted September 15, 2007 Go with your studs. THere is a reason why they are studs....they produce regardless of match up... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
